From: sjg@chromium.org (Simon Glass)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: BUG() dies silently
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 22:46:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTinvbd9hmcsxhWQtM70uBzgv7sESTQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimhk_G0fapzHAf0Gc-XhqT0qu+VbQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Ramirez Luna, Omar <omar.ramirez@ti.com> wrote:
...
> I am using CONFIG_BUG=y, however I don't have CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
> and hence I fall into the part which doesn't print the file and the
> line where the BUG was found.
>
> With Simon's patch if my .config had:
>
> CONFIG_BUG=y
> CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG is not set
In this case the patch is like a nop.
> CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE is not set
>
> I would fall into the same BUG definition that is causing issues:
>
> #define BUG() ? ? ? ? ? do { *(int *)0 = 0; } while (1)
>
> OTOH, is not like "Use generic BUG() handler" gives the choice of
> removing GENERIC_BUG given that it is not prompted in menuconfig and
> auto selected, if this is the intention is there any reason to keep
> the #else part of /* not CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG */? there is no way we can
> use it with this patch, right?
Well, er, the intention is that you use the patch. I kept the old code
around since people can then simply change the Kconfig option and be
back where they were, as indeed you have. I would be happy to remove
the old behavior, but I was concerned about a possible roasting in
this forum. Changing long-established behavior is sometimes tricky.
Regards,
Simon
>
> Regards,
>
> Omar
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-05 5:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-31 20:15 [PATCH] ARM: BUG() dies silently Omar Ramirez Luna
2011-04-01 1:47 ` Simon Glass
2011-04-01 8:44 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-04-01 22:29 ` Simon Glass
2011-04-03 7:15 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-04-05 1:55 ` Simon Glass
2011-04-05 17:36 ` Stephen Boyd
2011-04-05 2:29 ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
2011-04-05 5:46 ` Simon Glass [this message]
2011-04-05 16:02 ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
2011-04-05 16:43 ` Simon Glass
2011-09-17 6:07 ` Rabin Vincent
2011-09-19 14:26 ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
2011-09-19 14:43 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-19 16:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-19 18:02 ` Simon Glass
2011-09-19 18:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-19 18:32 ` Ramirez Luna, Omar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTinvbd9hmcsxhWQtM70uBzgv7sESTQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sjg@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).