From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: dt.tangr@gmail.com (Daniel Tang)
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 21:19:33 +1000
Subject: [RFC PATCHv3 3/6] clk: Add TI-Nspire clock drivers
In-Reply-To: <201305192148.46398.arnd@arndb.de>
References: <1368332581-94691-1-git-send-email-dt.tangr@gmail.com>
 <201305161417.28133.arnd@arndb.de>
 <F8915E01-0FCA-4C9F-8440-63B5A73B349B@gmail.com>
 <201305192148.46398.arnd@arndb.de>
Message-ID: <C574C0B3-194E-451A-8584-A351D85C5792@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org


On 20/05/2013, at 5:48 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:

> On Sunday 19 May 2013, Daniel Tang wrote:
>> If the vendors for the on-SOC components are unknown, should we just
>> leave the compatible strings as is (i.e. "nspire-XXX")?
> 
> In that case, I would use the name of the company that made the SoC.
> I believe someone mentioned it was made by LSI logic.

Yep, that's right. So "lsi,nspire-XXX" should be fine?

> 
> 	Arnd