From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A6CC433EF for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 07:37:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7238960F4F for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 07:37:31 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 7238960F4F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=canonical.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Cc:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=vScsUdQxhgYuxGqHVbCRDbGhnjgtksx2g3P41fwhllw=; b=3J9uNEIPvXBFHp SzQ2+LaBipSrYUkMcsluDKcdbzamh3tOpjfqzRzWNwtd4xdNjisoyxTP0eHM6VX1m8jHpbaRAitDX PVmcNAVRsocFpGtzGiLwXm9UG4d/zp0xR4t3wLFO+Hid+kU6rRcl9NhYrDr/U1Mq4qLOUs7K0TJag JfTA3A9zSoK/3hinCEPpQJ3ujAZmhcNzjvHDlWPZhtgd+XNLRAV3dszX6U9mdUIZYg8Ze8rjJfq0B tt+hnX2f5AhcMmxZOEskfc9fLmXcXgbzI6NYjrT8dzg6OCp7bk3SAA6d1oqWleD/ncvoPJ3IR8PvJ EzryfuINmzaIlXp65nyw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mUlAW-001peX-SW; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 07:35:21 +0000 Received: from smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com ([185.125.188.123]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mUlAS-001pdo-D2 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 07:35:18 +0000 Received: from mail-ed1-f72.google.com (mail-ed1-f72.google.com [209.85.208.72]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B826E3F0EB for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 07:35:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canonical.com; s=20210705; t=1632728108; bh=QW1BragpkRXGqpPQtCbMT32Uw58ORtzOcZAUH+jmJDY=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=t5sdW81wjwk1Ds/GwolfgZNqjQNhcaDWSvYhBpSqvYzSHeXeq/sgMvdpzqrohDYKI ru3M67wk63JAahD0cbI+0zCIjA/tExc0BGZRN5pONIfMW2YREawM7zeYF5xHvFZw96 9vGZ5sQIAALPeijuT/X3rMYZ6jnUY/COYiIRYxZga9F6HjwAabzqDHCb09s8BA67VT P/g9mALJxmj6oMcKSOhkBIeUcVUWzlUH4qoyPTgmQAQzDrfBQZUYLFs2Oi55SxEIfy j+S3jLiWryyb8+YWv41gDqbXSQ+a08AgYRPXL2wBnpJDUzru0WUkZul4XvQb9GaakE uj7fF5VS3UR0A== Received: by mail-ed1-f72.google.com with SMTP id a6-20020a50c306000000b003da30a380e1so11986077edb.23 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 00:35:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QW1BragpkRXGqpPQtCbMT32Uw58ORtzOcZAUH+jmJDY=; b=yuTjeZ6a86KJKBBziXWntnGLjtrz+jVstZ3tNOMBo1PWtI9opSpMiKGFbcKspzQZOB PS1vDEVHL303G9EMJlmwWH2eKhi1KokuqPm1QJX+s3NuOql9eaG25UDLhnKu+bC/ra1P sYm9bOObMH/trOeCQdg6voOGO4GzsRQQPhxBT1Io6g9Lll3jc9ftSNEg//tlkl5qxaku 1FnfCnnGmy64HKvcOUcoRQr1wUeK5SZz7T5kGgME2FRGW3Oeunatm+9V98RDFAKu16U6 J1+4y/TFm1vwLiAORfJWtRbDIVqYfQgDRN51qzR6xdSerZhaxHdfSBMQR/83GfabEeYE /bsw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532U5QGGjJgQ80vkQsURkWLZEsSvaeqtGXmi/patiqbywbv3Pcdk gwtaeOSg2pdzsSTo6qyouHiRUGQoefIZVwEs9nzUUnGTlI8YCt/MZiE9FAiUdPGPz+FJk54vXU9 PncDhWsVGW3VUvUMemhNR2YB+Le0HP+MvQuK0MZ8EyoZTUkSDQXuoXrtZes317qqS91F0 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:21eb:: with SMTP id ce11mr6169677edb.153.1632728108029; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 00:35:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxJw4wrJGwWTTWYy7m6jHnl15+/MkdfpdVxqxe1RSoKdBcPdtYUwYT3UnN/VqD+B1h1FwqdsxpK7taJ7DhKZqQ= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:21eb:: with SMTP id ce11mr6169667edb.153.1632728107888; Mon, 27 Sep 2021 00:35:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210924091439.2561931-1-andreas@kemnade.info> <20210924091439.2561931-5-andreas@kemnade.info> <20210926203314.7c187191@aktux> In-Reply-To: <20210926203314.7c187191@aktux> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 09:34:57 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] ARM: dts: imx6sl: fix mmc compatibles To: Andreas Kemnade Cc: Ahmad Fatoum , robh+dt@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com, linux-imx@nxp.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski , Lucas Stach X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210927_003516_698250_788606C4 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.31 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sun, 26 Sept 2021 at 20:33, Andreas Kemnade wrote: > > Hi Ahmad, > > On Sun, 26 Sep 2021 08:54:35 +0200 > Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > > > Hello Andreas, > > > > On 24.09.21 11:14, Andreas Kemnade wrote: > > > Binding specification only allows one compatible here. > > > > This same change was NACKed by Lucas here: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/72e1194e10ccb4f87aed96265114f0963e805092.camel@pengutronix.de/ > > > > I also think the schema should be fixed instead. > > > well, that argumentation makes sense. Feel free to drop this patch. I > will not repost the series if it is just about dropping patches. The argument of using a new DTB with an old kernel, therefore prohibiting changes in new DTB, does not make that much sense, except when caring about other systems which would like to directly reuse the DTB... anyway it's not that important to fight over it. Best regards, Krzysztof _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel