From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: govindraj.ti@gmail.com (Govindraj) Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:51:00 +0530 Subject: [PATCH v8 00/20] OMAP2+: UART: Runtime adaptation + cleanup In-Reply-To: <87zkewt5e0.fsf@ti.com> References: <1321005446-21741-1-git-send-email-govindraj.raja@ti.com> <87zkewt5e0.fsf@ti.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:02 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Govindraj writes: > > [...] > >> I have re-based this patch series against LO master >> commit id: deee6d5359969a0ce4e2760cfd7b9f379bd5698a >> >> Same is available here [1] >> >> I have tested this patch series along with: >> >> 1.) Tero's V11 irq chaining series >> ? ? ?http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg61445.html >> ? ? (This patch series is used for uart wakeup handling using >> ? ? ? prcm_irq chaining) >> >> 2.) Rajendra's hwmod change >> ? ? ?http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg148632.html >> ? ? ?(This patch handles init_no_idle flag setting >> ? ? ? without this patch there will be boot warning however >> ? ? ? all pm features will work after boot up.) > > Actually, without Rajendra's patch all features do not work. ?I don't > get UART console wakeups from idle (with runtime PM autosuspend enabled) > on 3430/n900 or 3530/Overo without Rajendra's patch. okay, I forgot last time when I tested without rajendra's patch was with a custom activate func. and now we have removed it. Yes you are correct Rajendra's patch + Tero's v11 series is a needed for proper uart_runtime_pm functioning. -- Thanks, Govindraj.R