linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: gnurou@gmail.com (Alexandre Courbot)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: tegra: basic support for Trusted Foundations
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 17:27:09 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAVeFuLc57pV=To5yaE5x9mrVy1yknH2e90QockCiNbEXRm0WQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51BA1B41.6030002@wwwdotorg.org>

On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 4:19 AM, Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
> On 06/13/2013 03:12 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> Add basic support for booting secondary processors on Tegra devices
>> using the Trusted Foundations secure monitor.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/tegra.txt    | 11 +++++
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt        |  1 +
>>  arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig                   |  1 +
>
> The defconfig change should be a separate patch, so that I can squash it
> into any other defconfig updates separately from all the code changes.

Ok, moved that part into its own patch.

>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/firmware.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/firmware.c
>
>> +void __init tegra_init_firmware(void)
>> +{
>> +     struct device_node *node;
>> +
>> +     if (!of_have_populated_dt())
>> +             return;
>> +
>> +     node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "tl,trusted-foundations");
>> +     if (node && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TEGRA_TRUSTED_FOUNDATIONS))
>> +             pr_warn("Trusted Foundations detected but support missing!\n");
>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TEGRA_TRUSTED_FOUNDATIONS)
>> +     else if (node)
>> +             register_firmware_ops(&tegra_trusted_foundations_ops);
>> +#endif
>> +}
>
> Is it worth continuing on in the node && !IS_ENABLED case here? After
> all, we can be pretty certain that the write to the CPU reset vector is
> immediately going to trap...

That's what was happening until 3.9, but from 3.10 on the trap is
apparently handled and the boot completes (although with only one
processor).

> I suppose that perhaps without SMP, cpuidle, suspend, ... we could keep
> running, but that seems a little niche.

If we can keep running, even in degraded mode, I see no reason to
panic. The problem is well reported in the kernel log, and having a
running system might be helpful to analyze the issue.

Thanks,
Alex.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-14  8:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-13  9:12 [PATCH v2 0/3] ARM: tegra: add basic support for Trusted Foundations Alexandre Courbot
2013-06-13  9:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: tegra: " Alexandre Courbot
2013-06-13 14:35   ` Dave Martin
2013-06-14  8:43     ` Alexandre Courbot
2013-06-14 15:28       ` Stephen Warren
2013-06-13 19:19   ` Stephen Warren
2013-06-14  8:27     ` Alexandre Courbot [this message]
2013-06-14 15:25       ` Stephen Warren
2013-06-19 11:11       ` Dave Martin
2013-06-13  9:12 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: tegra: split setting of CPU reset handler Alexandre Courbot
2013-06-13 19:21   ` Stephen Warren
2013-06-14  8:45     ` Alexandre Courbot
2013-06-13  9:12 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: tegra: set CPU reset handler with firmware op Alexandre Courbot
2013-06-13 19:23   ` Stephen Warren
2013-06-14  8:54     ` Alexandre Courbot
2013-06-14 15:30       ` Stephen Warren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAAVeFuLc57pV=To5yaE5x9mrVy1yknH2e90QockCiNbEXRm0WQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).