From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: padma.kvr@gmail.com (Padma Venkat) Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 16:21:58 +0530 Subject: [PATCH V5 2/2] ASoC: SAMSUNG: Add DT support for i2s In-Reply-To: References: <1355395373-22058-1-git-send-email-padma.v@samsung.com> <1355395373-22058-3-git-send-email-padma.v@samsung.com> <20121219132414.2CF653E0AD7@localhost> <20121219170937.GV4985@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <008401cddfad$ae2d19e0$0a874da0$@samsung.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Padma Venkat wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 12:32 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: >> Padma Venkat wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Mark Brown >>> wrote: >>> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 01:24:14PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote: >>> >> On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:12:53 +0530, Padmavathi Venna >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >> > +- compatible : "samsung,samsung-i2s" >>> > >>> >> Isn't that kind of redundant? :-) >>> > >>> >> The format of the compatible strings should be ",>> number>-i2s". >>> >> Please be specific about the part number that you're doing the binding >>> >> for. For example; use "samsung,exynos4210-i2s" instead of >>> "samsung,exynos-i2s". >>> > >>> > There are actually versioned IPs here (where the versions are used >>> > publically in a few places) but it's not clearly documented which is >>> > which. It would be reasonable to use the IP versions here I think. >>> >>> Samsung has three i2s drivers one for s3c24xx, one for s3c2412 and one >>> for rest of the platforms. The above mentioned other platforms has >>> Version 3/4/5 of i2s controllers. This dt binding is for for the i2s >> >> Where is the version defined such as 3, 4, 5? So, what is the >> "sound/soc/Samsung/s3c-i2s-v2.[ch]"? > > Versions 3, 4, 5 are defined in dev-audio.c file of corresponding platforms. > s3c-i2s-v2 is used in s3c2412 platform. > >> >>> driver that has support for Version 3/4/5 of i2s controller. So >>> "samsung,i2s-v5" is okay as compatible name? Please suggest me. >>> >> I agree with using version here but we need some consensus about that. Any suggestions on i2s compatible name or "samsung,i2s-v5" is okay? >> >> - Kukjin >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in >> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > Thanks > Padma Thanks Padma