From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: moritz.fischer@ettus.com (Moritz Fischer) Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 22:03:49 -0700 Subject: [RFCv2 2/3] dts: zynq: Add devicetree entry for Xilinx Zynq reset controller. In-Reply-To: <55B5D62D.4010407@monstr.eu> References: <1437783682-13632-1-git-send-email-moritz.fischer@ettus.com> <1437783682-13632-3-git-send-email-moritz.fischer@ettus.com> <55B5D62D.4010407@monstr.eu> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Michal, I agree we need to be careful with changing the bindings. On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Michal Simek wrote: > Hi Moritz, > > On 07/25/2015 02:21 AM, Moritz Fischer wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer >> --- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi | 43 ++++++++++++- > > This patch is nice in general but every change in binding should be > discussed separately. There is also necessary to wire them up in the > driver to do action. That's why I think that will be the best just to > add the code to slcr and keep others untouched. Ok, just to clarify: You'd suggest to just add the rstc as child node to the slcr, and leave the other nodes untouched? > > For example MACB/GEM is one example. Adding names to this node and > extending driver to work properly with reset means that all others MACB > users will be affected. Definitely this patch should be ACKed by Nicolas. > > Thanks, > Michal > > -- > Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91 > w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854 > Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/ > Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture > Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform > > Cheers, Moritz