From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ruslan.bilovol@ti.com (Ruslan Bilovol) Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 15:04:29 +0300 Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] omap4/twl6030: typical connection to omap4 as a separate dtsi file In-Reply-To: <520B8B45.1010300@baylibre.com> References: <1376469348-10797-1-git-send-email-ruslan.bilovol@ti.com> <520B8B45.1010300@baylibre.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Benoit, On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Benoit Cousson wrote: > Hi Ruslan, > > On 14/08/2013 10:35, Ruslan Bilovol wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> There is no functional changes between v1 and v2 - just >> added the patch for omap4-var-som - Uri Yosef confirmed >> this board have the same connection of OMAP4<->TWL6030 as >> SDP4430 board > > > The series looks good to me, but it will be good to have a test for Panda > and Variscite boards before merging it. Okay, so I just verified this patch series on PandaBoard ES2. Should I resubmit this series with fixed commit message? However I cannot verify the patch for Variscite board because I do not own any such board so you can drop that patch. But maybe Uri Yosef can verify it. Uri? > > Regards, > Benoit -- Best regards, Ruslan Bilvol