From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: groeck@google.com (Guenter Roeck)
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 12:36:37 -0700
Subject: [PATCH v3 01/15] phy: rockchip-emmc: give DLL some extra time to
 be ready
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=UMFEDzKT0VkVYxmzxKkFVKREhhXhm+McmdQDriHKhPKg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1466445414-11974-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org>
 <1466445414-11974-2-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org>
 <CABXOdTeQhOSUeX+-as_6S5H1mnVnyBsEDU9ZsiC97Yb+qWiFew@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAD=FV=UMFEDzKT0VkVYxmzxKkFVKREhhXhm+McmdQDriHKhPKg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CABXOdTccLMbspfprfLP9CTkD9YbfJsPKOXV7RsVKfU94zPLhNg@mail.gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Guenter Roeck <groeck@google.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Douglas Anderson
>> <dianders@chromium.org> wrote:
>>> From: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
>>>
>>> According to the databook, 10.2us is the max time for dll to be ready to
>>> work. However in testing, some chips need 20us for dll to be ready. This
>>
>> Nitpick, but description (20uS) and code (more than 25 uS) don't match.
>
> Good catch.  If I spin the series I'll fix this, otherwise I'll assume
> that the person applying this (Ulf?) can fix the description at their
> discretion.
>

Not that it matters much, as the code is replaced in a later patch
anyway. It might make more sense to merge the two patches into one.

Guenter