From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linus.walleij@linaro.org (Linus Walleij)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 21:25:35 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: pinctrl-imx: fix map setting problem if
 NO_PAD_CTL is set
In-Reply-To: <1340187227-25343-1-git-send-email-jason77.wang@gmail.com>
References: <1340187227-25343-1-git-send-email-jason77.wang@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYXuRC0d1NcUEfRZbfgis+9xVyzsEFpGmS21xYBmyrAPg@mail.gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Hui Wang <jason77.wang@gmail.com> wrote:

> new_map is allocated according to map_num instead of grp->npins,
> if a pin or some pins of a group has NO_PAD_CTL property, the map_num
> and the grp->npin are different definitely.
>
> When we set mapping information to the new_map[], we should skip those
> pins with NO_PAD_CTL from index, otherwise it is possible the driver
> will aceesss to a unallocated region.
>
> Cc: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@linaro.org>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hui Wang <jason77.wang@gmail.com>
> ---
> In the v2, according to dong.aisheng's suggestion, change to use j as index.

OK applied this v2 version. Is this a serious bug fix that is causing
regressions right now and needs to go into the -rc:s for v3.5 or can it wait
for v3.6?

Thanks,
Linus Walleij