From: linus.walleij@linaro.org (Linus Walleij)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv2 02/10] ARM: vic: MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER handler
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:55:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZKns-GraGp-YMD6jzOPETkvEpt9bC8HcYUmf3JUyCV3A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110928203905.GB2838@ponder.secretlab.ca>
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Grant Likely
<grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
> Why isn't it simply written this way:
>
> ? ? ? ?stat = readl_relaxed(vic->base + VIC_IRQ_STATUS);
> ? ? ? ?while (stat) {
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?irq = fls(stat) - 1;
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?handle_IRQ(irq_domain_to_irq(&vic->domain, irq), regs);
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?stat &= ~(1 << irq);
> ? ? ? ?}
That is indeed closer to the assembly loop most platforms have
implemented.
Jamie can you test this approach? And also use ffs() insteadof
fls()...
Thanks,
Linus Walleij
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-29 6:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-28 10:41 [PATCHv2 00/10] VIC DT binding and MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER Jamie Iles
2011-09-28 10:41 ` [PATCHv2 01/10] ARM: vic: device tree binding Jamie Iles
2011-09-28 20:11 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-29 4:00 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-28 10:41 ` [PATCHv2 02/10] ARM: vic: MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER handler Jamie Iles
2011-09-28 11:09 ` Linus Walleij
2011-09-28 12:08 ` Jamie Iles
2011-09-28 20:39 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-29 6:55 ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2011-09-29 9:30 ` Jamie Iles
2011-09-29 16:55 ` Grant Likely
2011-11-02 13:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-11-02 14:08 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-03 12:29 ` Linus Walleij
2011-11-03 12:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-11-03 13:00 ` Linus Walleij
2011-11-03 13:04 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-03 13:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-11-03 15:03 ` Jamie Iles
2011-11-03 15:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-11-03 13:49 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-09-29 15:03 ` Zoltan Devai
2011-09-29 15:13 ` Jamie Iles
2011-09-28 10:41 ` [PATCHv2 03/10] ARM: ep93xx: convert to MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER Jamie Iles
2011-09-28 11:15 ` Linus Walleij
2011-09-28 10:41 ` [PATCHv2 04/10] ARM: netx: " Jamie Iles
2011-09-28 10:41 ` [PATCHv2 05/10] ARM: nomadik: " Jamie Iles
2011-09-28 11:12 ` Linus Walleij
2011-09-28 10:41 ` [PATCHv2 06/10] ARM: s3c64xx: " Jamie Iles
2011-09-28 10:41 ` [PATCHv2 07/10] ARM: spear: " Jamie Iles
2011-09-28 10:41 ` [PATCHv2 08/10] ARM: u300: " Jamie Iles
2011-09-28 11:03 ` Linus Walleij
2011-09-28 12:03 ` Jamie Iles
2011-09-28 12:18 ` Linus Walleij
2011-09-28 12:29 ` Jamie Iles
2011-09-28 10:41 ` [PATCHv2 09/10] ARM: versatile: " Jamie Iles
2011-09-28 10:41 ` [PATCHv2 10/10] ARM: samsung: " Jamie Iles
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACRpkdZKns-GraGp-YMD6jzOPETkvEpt9bC8HcYUmf3JUyCV3A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).