From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linus.walleij@linaro.org (Linus Walleij) Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 14:26:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: update the documentation for some pinconfig params In-Reply-To: <201306161245.30465.heiko@sntech.de> References: <201306141741.46077.heiko@sntech.de> <201306141742.21808.heiko@sntech.de> <201306161245.30465.heiko@sntech.de> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Heiko St?bner wrote: > Am Sonntag, 16. Juni 2013, 12:26:38 schrieb Linus Walleij: >> Can't we rely on PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE for all this? > > you're the boss on this, I'll do whatever you say :-) Oh that's not good. As can be seen from past experience I am often avoiding to do horrible design mistakes by other smart people telling me how wrong I am ... > Actually I'm too more comfortable with only using bias-disable. > > So I'll redo this patch to remove the disabling of a pull via this method, if > that's the right way to go. I sent some patch on how I'd like it defined, please check it. > Same with the rockchip driver. Hm I merged that patch actually, but you can send a v2 if you want me to replace it. Or a patch on top, if preferred. Yours, Linus Walleij