From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linus.walleij@linaro.org (Linus Walleij) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 22:26:10 +0100 Subject: [PATCH V3 10/11] ARM: remove struct sys_timer suspend and resume fields In-Reply-To: <50B3C211.6000600@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1353349867-28494-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <1353349867-28494-11-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <50B3C211.6000600@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 11/21/2012 01:28 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: >> Oh and there was this comment/TODO: >> I was thinking that if your patch set is introducing a >> plethora of new users of these hooks we should maybe >> stick a patch at the beginning of the series renaming the >> hooks to *_noirq, but if it's a major obstacle it can surely wait. > > I think I'd prefer to keep that rename separate and do it later; while > this series does introduce a few new users of the type, there are many > more pre-existing users. Renaming all the users would end up making this > series potentially conflict with addition of new users in tip.git or > elsewhere, whereas any possible current conflicts from this series > should be resolvable in arm-soc pretty easily I hope, so I'd rather > create a separate series that does the rename, and probably apply it to > tip.git, probably for 3.10? Sure no big deal. Acked-by: Linus Walleij Yours, Linus Walleij