From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linus.walleij@linaro.org (Linus Walleij) Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:51:37 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 11/19] ARM: ux500: Add all known I2C sub-device nodes to the HREF DT In-Reply-To: <20120914084729.GG3374@gmail.com> References: <1347016499-29354-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1347016499-29354-12-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20120914084729.GG3374@gmail.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:34:15AM -0700, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >> >> > Here we add the skeleton nodes for each of the known I2C sub-devices >> > currently registered on ST-Ericsson's HREF Development Platform. We >> > will fill these nodes in turn as the drivers are enabled for Device >> > Tree. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones >> >> Can't we have it the other way around (discussing patch ordering >> with Arnd simultaneously), so you first add the DT support to the >> subdevices, then add the more complete nodes to the device tree? >> >> And if you put in a device tree like this, will these devices >> not collide with the ones that are currently supplied from >> the boardfiles? I'm a bit confused here, maybe I'm not smart >> enough to understand this... > > Okay, I've reordered the patch-set to address these possible issues. OK sorry for delay, I've been patch-swamped... Acked-by: Linus Walleij Yours, Linus Walleij