From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linus.walleij@linaro.org (Linus Walleij) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 10:09:34 +0100 Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: imx: add pinmux-imx6q support In-Reply-To: <65EE16ACC360FA4D99C96DC085B3F772345A0B@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net> References: <1322999384-7886-1-git-send-email-b29396@freescale.com> <1322999384-7886-3-git-send-email-b29396@freescale.com> <20111206072326.GA3712@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net> <65EE16ACC360FA4D99C96DC085B3F772345A0B@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Dong Aisheng-B29396 wrote: >> From: Guo Shawn-R65073 >> As I do not see the device tree probing added in pinmux-imx-core.c, I >> expect the patch has not got the chance to run on imx6, right? >> > Yes, I would add it if the pinctrl framework supports DT. There are many levels of DT. You can of course add DT-support for anything driver-specific, such as init data for some registers, or anything else you would normally pass in through platform data. So please just do that if imx6 already has support for such things. What we're discussing about right now on devicetree-discuss is where to put the mapping tables etc that is currently registered by the board, that has no obvious solution as there is some disagreement on how to do that. Linus Walleij