From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tom.leiming@gmail.com (Ming Lei) Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:16:57 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 2/6] ARM: OMAP2+: Remove board-omap4panda.c In-Reply-To: <87ppvlqhyy.fsf@lebrac.rtp-net.org> References: <20130517191304.468.73487.stgit@localhost> <20130517191753.468.1734.stgit@localhost> <20130612163124.GD8164@atomide.com> <20130612171407.GM8164@atomide.com> <51B98F1E.1000006@ti.com> <51B99B07.1050806@ti.com> <51BEBDCD.3060104@ti.com> <87ppvlqhyy.fsf@lebrac.rtp-net.org> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Arnaud Patard wrote: > Sricharan R writes: > > I hoped to have missed some mails and that people were testing pandabard > support with full support but given what I see, the ethernet support is > not there yet. This thread is about removing the non-DT boot. I see some > contradiction here. Please, look again at what Thomas said in the IGEP thread: > breaking existing support is bad and removing non-DT boot for panda with > not-working ethernet would exactly to that. +1 Even no any USB support on Sricharan's setting. > > Yeah, I'm aware that some extra patches are being developped like the > omap clocks one: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2541331/ but they > don't seem to be in -next. So, again, please, wait that all needed bits > are merged mainline before killing non-DT support (or provide 'mixed' > support like what is/was done on kirkwood) Agree, please don't be too quick, :-) Thanks, -- Ming Lei