linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: grant.likely@secretlab.ca (Grant Likely)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 22:14:59 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACxGe6t7Mdr+w+aGFPM2-FEAQaYHuG8Za9dybLgMo-5-whLyNQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110920.224910.1996429830782124690.davem@davemloft.net>

On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 8:49 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:24:01 -0500
>
>> Hopefully, this is the final or near final version of GIC binding support.
>>
>> Changes from the previous version:
>> - SPIs and PPIs are numbered starting at 0. Now the gic has it's own irq
>> ? domain translate function instead of the simple domain one.
>> - interrupt cell format has changed based on Grant's proposal.
>> - Dropped "ARM: gic: allow irq_start to be 0". Instead, the first 16 irqs
>> ? are skipped and the domain irq_base adjusted accordingly.
>> - Added a fix to of_irq_find_parent when the parent == child.
>> - Renamed intc_desc.parent to intc_desc.interrupt_parent.
>> - Implemented Grant's algorithm for walking the list of interrupt
>> ? controllers. Added a return value to interrupt init functions, so they
>> ? don't get added to the parent list on a init failure.
>>
>> The changes are significant enough that I did not include previous
>> acked/reviewed/tested-by's.
>
> Just out of curiosity where does this "interrupt-parent" property
> come from?
>
> On platforms I am familiar with, the parent path is walked to the root
> and we stop at device nodes that have "interrupt-map" and
> "interrupt-map-mask" properties.
>
> The map and mask are applied to the "reg" property of the device in
> question to see which map entry matches, if a match is found the map
> entry contains the translated interrupt.
>
> And this process continues over and over all the way to the root to get
> the system interrupt that processor actually deals with.
>
> The mechanism shown here seems overly simplistic and not able to handle
> the cases handled by existing OF property schemes in use for several
> years on real systems.

interrupt-parent has been implemented for years on powerpc.  I don't
know if it was ever an Open Firmware thing, but it is in ePAPR [1],
and ARM isn't doing anything novel in that regard.

[1] section 2.4, page 30,
https://www.power.org/resources/downloads/Power_ePAPR_APPROVED_v1.1.pdf

It is true that is cannot handle all situations, but for those
interrupt-map is still available.

g.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-21  4:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-20 20:24 [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings Rob Herring
2011-09-20 20:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] of/irq: of_irq_find_parent: check for parent equal to child Rob Herring
2011-09-20 21:01   ` Grant Likely
2011-09-20 20:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] of/irq: introduce of_irq_init Rob Herring
2011-09-20 23:00   ` Grant Likely
2011-09-21 10:01   ` Jamie Iles
2011-09-23  2:21   ` [PATCH v3] " Rob Herring
2011-09-23  5:14     ` Grant Likely
2011-09-26 19:24     ` [PATCH v4] " Rob Herring
2011-09-27  1:53       ` Grant Likely
2011-09-27 13:03         ` Rob Herring
2011-09-27 21:24           ` Grant Likely
2011-09-20 20:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: gic: add OF based initialization Rob Herring
2011-09-20 23:08   ` Grant Likely
2011-09-21  1:54     ` Rob Herring
2011-09-21 17:15   ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-21 17:55     ` Rob Herring
2011-09-21 19:28       ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-21 20:27         ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-26 19:57   ` Jamie Iles
2011-09-26 20:49     ` Rob Herring
2011-09-26 21:11       ` Jamie Iles
2011-09-26 21:32         ` Rob Herring
2011-09-26 22:00           ` Jamie Iles
2011-09-26 22:29   ` Jamie Iles
2011-09-21  2:49 ` [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings David Miller
2011-09-21  4:14   ` Grant Likely [this message]
2011-09-21  4:58     ` Mitch Bradley
2011-09-21  5:21       ` David Miller
2011-09-21  7:11         ` Mitch Bradley
2011-09-21  5:16   ` Segher Boessenkool
2011-09-21  9:43 ` Shawn Guo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-09-30 19:27 Rob Herring
2011-10-04 16:15 ` Rob Herring
2011-10-08 14:04 ` Thomas Abraham

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACxGe6t7Mdr+w+aGFPM2-FEAQaYHuG8Za9dybLgMo-5-whLyNQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).