From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: grant.likely@secretlab.ca (Grant Likely) Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 23:13:45 -0600 Subject: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have people interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?] In-Reply-To: <1374988276.1973.29.camel@dabdike> References: <20130725175702.GC22291@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <2007664.vYsECFSKrV@flatron> <51F39FD8.6080808@broadcom.com> <2460092.aLmjrOVh1g@flatron> <51F3A82E.2000907@broadcom.com> <1374988276.1973.29.camel@dabdike> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 11:11 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > If you want actually to describe and have validated the xml schema > itself, then you'd use xsd (XML schema description language) and its > associated tools. > > I'm not saying you *should* do this, just that it's possible (plus I've > just blown my kernel cred by knowing about xml, sigh). :) g.