From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jagannadh.teki@gmail.com (Jagan Teki) Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 17:20:19 +0530 Subject: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 02/21] arm64: dts: allwinner: a64: Add DE2 CCU In-Reply-To: References: <20180430114058.5061-1-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> <20180430114058.5061-3-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> <20180502113250.5i2eyzv237t5oyl6@flea> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 5:04 PM, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > > > ? 2018?5?2? GMT+08:00 ??7:32:50, Maxime Ripard ??: >>On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 05:10:39PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: >>> DE2 in A64 has clock control unit and behavior is >>> same like H3/H5, so reuse the same in A64. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki >>> --- >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi | 15 +++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi >>b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi >>> index 1b2ef28c42bd..67b80bbe5bf5 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi >>> @@ -43,9 +43,11 @@ >>> */ >>> >>> #include >>> +#include >>> #include >>> #include >>> #include >>> +#include >>> >>> / { >>> interrupt-parent = <&gic>; >>> @@ -168,6 +170,19 @@ >>> #size-cells = <1>; >>> ranges; >>> >>> + display_clocks: clock at 1000000 { >>> + compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-de2-clk", >>> + "allwinner,sun50i-h5-de2-clk"; >> >>The A64 was released before the H5, so that should be the other way >>around. >> >>> + reg = <0x01000000 0x100000>; >>> + clocks = <&ccu CLK_DE>, >>> + <&ccu CLK_BUS_DE>; >>> + clock-names = "mod", >>> + "bus"; >>> + resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_DE>; >>> + #clock-cells = <1>; >>> + #reset-cells = <1>; >>> + }; >>> + >> >>So it turns out we don't need the SRAM to access the CCU driver? > > As now U-Boot claims SRAM, people may forget thus :-( I've sent few mails about how we represent de2 with sram_c [1] but none response after. Can I get further inputs so-that we can include sram_c in proper manner. [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10289737/ Jagan.