From: xiechao.mail@gmail.com (Chao Xie)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: common clock framwork: clk_set_rate issue
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 10:52:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADApbej+f9P1sgLMR8_McoCCSLDjJt_qitWdNd8X1v6PwZqsnQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
hi
When develop the clk drivers for SOCs based on common clock framework.
I met a issue.
For example there is a uart device, it's function clock comes from a
divider, and the divider's parent is a mux. It means
MUX --> DIV --> UART
As we know that UART can work at low baudrate for a terminal, while it
can also connect to GPS module which needs a high rate. So the MUX
will provide two clock source, a low clock rate and high clock rate.
The MUX clk driver clk-mux.c does not implement a ->round_rate callbacks.
It means that when uart driver is used for a GPS and it want to change
it clock, the driver will call clk_set_rate(); clk_set_rate will loop
upward to DIV, and DIV will try to set its divider, and it need loop
upward to MUX.
In fact the current clk drivers have some issue.
MUX clk driver should provide the round_rate callback, it then can
provide a new_rate. It means that in clk_calc_subtree MUX can switch
the clock source.
So in the uart driver we can depends on the configuration passed by
device tree to initiaze the clock for different purpose. This driver
may be shared by many SOCs, so it does not care the clock framework.
next reply other threads:[~2012-12-06 2:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-06 2:52 Chao Xie [this message]
2012-12-17 20:19 ` common clock framwork: clk_set_rate issue Sascha Hauer
2012-12-18 2:19 ` Chao Xie
2012-12-18 7:47 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-12-19 6:49 ` Chao Xie
2012-12-19 9:03 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CADApbej+f9P1sgLMR8_McoCCSLDjJt_qitWdNd8X1v6PwZqsnQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=xiechao.mail@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).