From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: leoli@freescale.com (Li Yang) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 15:08:04 -0600 Subject: [PATCH v4 5/6] PCI: layerscape: add PCIe support for LS1043a and LS2080a In-Reply-To: <20151022180813.GA25693@localhost> References: <1444979960-24100-1-git-send-email-Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com> <1444979960-24100-5-git-send-email-Minghuan.Lian@freescale.com> <20151021213612.GK1583@localhost> <20151022180813.GA25693@localhost> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > Hi Leo, > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:38:48PM -0500, Li Yang wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 03:19:19PM +0800, Minghuan Lian wrote: >> >> Both LS1043a and LS2080a are based on ARMv8 64-bit architecture >> >> and have similar PCIe implementation. LUT is added to controller. >> >> The patch removes the necessary fields from struct ls_pcie. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Minghuan Lian >> >> --- >> >> This patch is based on v4.3-rc4 and [PATCH v10 3/6] >> >> PCI: designware: Add ARM64 support. >> >> Hi Bjorn, >> >> Are you also applying this patch >> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/531184/ in this merge windows? >> Because the new hardware can only work with the generic ARM64 support >> added in the designware pcie driver. > > I'm reviewing that patch right now, and I do hope to apply it for > v4.4. > > There was no cover letter for this series (Minghuan's Layerscape v4 > series), and I didn't see any mention of dependencies, so I applied it > on top of v4.3-rc1. Is that the wrong thing to do? If it depends on > the Zhou's v11 series, I can hold the Layerscape branch until after > that. I noticed that you have merged Zhou's latest patch. Probably you can also merge the Layerscape branch now. Regards, Leo