From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jean.pihet@linaro.org (Jean Pihet) Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:42:05 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 0/3] ARM64: add perf support In-Reply-To: <20131216173214.GK20193@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1387212873-8248-1-git-send-email-jean.pihet@linaro.org> <20131216173214.GK20193@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Will, On 16 December 2013 18:32, Will Deacon wrote: > Jean, > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 04:54:30PM +0000, Jean Pihet wrote: >> Add perf support for the AARCH64 architecture. This includes the >> support for: > > To be fair, we do have perf support already. This is extending what we have > by adding additional arch-specific stuff. Ok I can change the descriptions accordingly. >> - AARCH64 perf registers definition and hooks, >> - compat mode registers use, i.e. profiling a 32-bit binary on >> a 64-bit system, >> - unwinding using the dwarf information from the .debug_frame >> section of the ELF binary; only in 64-bit mode, >> - unwinding using the frame pointer information; in 64-bit and >> compat modes. > > Why did you send out two copies of this series to different lists? Which one > should I be looking at? The two copies actually are the same patches. I just forgot the l-a-k ML address first and so re-sent the series. Sorry about that ;-| > /confused Thx for looking at the series! > > Will Jean