From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linucherian@gmail.com (Linu Cherian) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:36:48 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Increase number of memslots to 512 In-Reply-To: References: <1484153537-20984-1-git-send-email-linucherian@gmail.com> <61fa02f8-b244-6bae-eaa1-cb745ea543e1@arm.com> <6fc30f74-d1ab-028f-7e5f-a5d1fe69c17a@arm.com> <868tqdvrzu.fsf@arm.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 9:53 PM, Geetha Akula wrote: > Hi Marc, > > We have been testing vfio patches regularly. We are in contact with Eric > offline. In fact we are the first one to test V5 patches on Eric request as > he had some issue with his test setup. After our feedback it was posted in > upstream. > We also reported issues found with vfio patches. We been contact with Eric > regularly. > > Thanks, > Geetha. > > On 14-Jan-2017 4:17 PM, "Marc Zyngier" wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jan 14 2017 at 09:53:52 AM, Linu Cherian >> wrote: >> >> Let me be more precise. At the moment, KVM on arm64 doesn't support the >> >> delivery of MSIs generated by physical devices into a guest (patches >> >> are >> >> in progress, but not merged yet). So unless you used devices that have >> >> no need for interrupts, I don't see how this works. >> >> >> >> Can you shed some light on your test process? >> >> >> > >> > We did the testing on top of latest VFIO msi support patches submitted >> > by Eric Auger. >> >> Did you? That's reassuring. It would have been good if any of the Cavium >> folks did chime in on the list and help reviewing though - so far, all >> I've heard is a deafening silence. I guess there was no hurry for Cavium >> to see these patches being merged. >> May i know if this patch is queued for merge. Thanks.