From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: djkurtz@chromium.org (Daniel Kurtz) Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 02:23:48 -0800 Subject: [PATCH v6] clk: mediatek: Export CPU mux clocks for CPU frequency control In-Reply-To: <20151217090628.GA317@quark.deferred.io> References: <1442230072-31593-1-git-send-email-pi-cheng.chen@linaro.org> <20151217090628.GA317@quark.deferred.io> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Michael, Pi-Cheng, On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 1:06 AM, Michael Turquette wrote: > > On 12/01, Pi-Cheng Chen wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Daniel Kurtz wrote: > > > Hi Pi-Cheng and Michael, > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Pi-Cheng Chen wrote: > > >> From: "pi-cheng.chen" > > >> > > >> This patch adds CPU mux clocks which are used by Mediatek cpufreq driver > > >> for intermediate clock source switching. > > > > > > It looks like this patch was never picked up. > > > It is required for MT8173 cpufreq. > > > > > > What is the plan to get this one merged? > > > > Hi Dan, > > Mike is working on a new CCF feature called "coordinated clock rate changes" > > which would help to migrate mt8173-cpufreq driver to generic cpufreq-dt > > driver, and I am working with him to port MT8173 clock driver on the new > > feature. So I think that's why this patch was not picked since it will > > be migrated to new implementation once the new feature's ready. > > > > @Mike: > > Are you plannig to post those patches on the mailing list ? > > Or is it fine for you to take this first and then I will refine it for > > the new feature later? > > I plan to post those patches next week. Were these patches ever posted? Or should we consider going ahead and trying to merge this 4-month old MTK CPU mux clock patch into v4.5 before it is too late? Thanks, -Dan