From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wens@csie.org (Chen-Yu Tsai) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 10:24:04 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v3 05/13] ARM: dts: sun9i: Add clock-indices property for bus gate clocks In-Reply-To: <20150114163351.GY4891@lukather> References: <1421113055-17867-1-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> <1421113055-17867-6-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> <20150114163351.GY4891@lukather> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 09:37:27AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >> of_clk_get_parent_name() uses the clock-indices property to resolve >> clock phandle arguments in case that the argument index does not >> match the clock-output-names sequence. >> >> This is the case on sunxi, where we use the actual bit index as the >> argument to the phandle. Add the clock-indices property so that >> of_clk_get_parent_name() resolves the names correctly. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai > > Applied. Are the mask in the clock driver still of any use now? I > don't think they are, and if we're going that way, I'd rather have > them removed from the driver. Yes they are still passed through factors_data, for mux_clk_ops to know about the width of the mux, which is 3 bits on older SoCs vs 4 bits on sun9i. ChenYu