From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wens@csie.org (Chen-Yu Tsai) Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 16:01:37 +0800 Subject: [linux-sunxi] Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 2/9] iio: adc: add support for X-Powers AXP20X and AXP22X PMICs ADCs In-Reply-To: <13f2f8ba-af9e-576e-24ee-60c3a1609f80@free-electrons.com> References: <20170320081653.8884-1-quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com> <20170320081653.8884-3-quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com> <20170323093527.ojcdpvruzqnhvysq@earth> <13f2f8ba-af9e-576e-24ee-60c3a1609f80@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Quentin Schulz wrote: > Hi, > > On 23/03/2017 10:52, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:34:45PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >>>> P.S. I'm thinking about having MFD_AXP20X imply its various sub-drivers. >>>> Not sure if that was the intended usage of the new imply syntax though. >>> >>> I think adding "default MFD_AXP20X" to the sub-drivers is cleaner, >>> as you will not end up with a long list. >> >> I'd still need to add imply statements for the various subsystems though, >> like regulators, power supplies, extcon, etc.. >> But I suppose that's cleaner, and fits the original intent of the syntax. >> > > Hum. I don't really understand what you are saying.. Am I supposed to > modify something or, is it okay and we're waiting for Lee to apply on > his tree? > > Thanks in advance for clearing it up, > > Quentin I'm just mentioning some follow up tasks I want to do. The patch is fine and we're waiting for Lee to take it. ChenYu