[PATCH v7 00/11] Add generic set_rate clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx for samsung SoCs

[sajjan.linux@gmail.com (Vikas Sajjan)]

Hi Mike,

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org> wrote:
> Quoting Vikas Sajjan (2013-07-21 23:15:27)
>> Hi Kukjin / Mike,
>>
>> Can you apply this series
>
> Let me apply this to see if the dependencies are taken care of now. If
> so I'll just take it through the clk tree.
>

Any updates on this series.
I could NOT see them at
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/mturquette/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/clk-next


> Regards,
> Mike
>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Yadwinder Singh Brar
>> <yadi.brar01@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Kukjin / Mike,
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
>> >> Mike Turquette wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-06-24 08:02:39)
>> >>> > On 06/22/13 01:31, Mike Turquette wrote:
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org>
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > Or I can take this through the clk tree. Either way is fine.
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > Mike, please go ahead taking this series into the clk tree for 3.11.
>> >>>
>> >>> Actually it might be better for you to take it. Patch #5 relies on
>> >>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c which only exists in the samsung
>> >>> tree.  It was introduced by commit 1609027f, "clk: exynos5420: register
>> >>> clocks using common clock framework".
>> >>>
>> >> Yes, you're right. It depends on soc-exynos5420 stuff in samsung tree.
>> >>
>> >>> And these patches need to be applied with some fuzz to the clk tree due
>> >>> to other changes which are not in my tree and only present in yours.
>> >>>
>> >>> The best two options are either for you to take this series or it can be
>> >>> rebased on top of clk-next, after which I'll apply it.
>> >>>
>> >> Let me try to send this series via samsung tree for v3.11 but I'm not sure because it's a little bit late for arm-soc tree.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for your ack, just note I will send to arm-soc tonight in my time.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Can we get this series merge now in any of trees.
>> > Please let me if its required to rebase it.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Yadwinder