From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sajjan.linux@gmail.com (Vikas Sajjan) Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 18:43:04 +0530 Subject: [PATCH v7 00/11] Add generic set_rate clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx for samsung SoCs In-Reply-To: <20130723012621.7598.46496@quantum> References: <1370943076-13461-1-git-send-email-yadi.brar@samsung.com> <1524664.UCV47tfIRU@flatron> <20130621163143.9136.28807@quantum> <51C85F8F.9050501@samsung.com> <20130624190227.20448.68120@quantum> <007001ce7149$1f683f40$5e38bdc0$%kim@samsung.com> <20130723012621.7598.46496@quantum> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Mike, On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Vikas Sajjan (2013-07-21 23:15:27) >> Hi Kukjin / Mike, >> >> Can you apply this series > > Let me apply this to see if the dependencies are taken care of now. If > so I'll just take it through the clk tree. > Any updates on this series. I could NOT see them at http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/mturquette/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/clk-next > Regards, > Mike > >> >> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Yadwinder Singh Brar >> wrote: >> > Hi Kukjin / Mike, >> > >> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: >> >> Mike Turquette wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-06-24 08:02:39) >> >>> > On 06/22/13 01:31, Mike Turquette wrote: >> >>> > > >> >>> > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette >> >>> > > >> >>> > > Or I can take this through the clk tree. Either way is fine. >> >>> > > >> >>> > Mike, please go ahead taking this series into the clk tree for 3.11. >> >>> >> >>> Actually it might be better for you to take it. Patch #5 relies on >> >>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c which only exists in the samsung >> >>> tree. It was introduced by commit 1609027f, "clk: exynos5420: register >> >>> clocks using common clock framework". >> >>> >> >> Yes, you're right. It depends on soc-exynos5420 stuff in samsung tree. >> >> >> >>> And these patches need to be applied with some fuzz to the clk tree due >> >>> to other changes which are not in my tree and only present in yours. >> >>> >> >>> The best two options are either for you to take this series or it can be >> >>> rebased on top of clk-next, after which I'll apply it. >> >>> >> >> Let me try to send this series via samsung tree for v3.11 but I'm not sure because it's a little bit late for arm-soc tree. >> >> >> >> Thanks for your ack, just note I will send to arm-soc tonight in my time. >> >> >> > >> > Can we get this series merge now in any of trees. >> > Please let me if its required to rebase it. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Yadwinder