From: 21cnbao@gmail.com (Barry Song)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] MM: CMA: add a simple kernel module as the helper to test CMA
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 12:57:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4xJoKGt3+b_3bteoMyeO615pCxFpMpsH4LtvufFNDv6bA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F56EA49.8070808@gmail.com>
2012/3/7 Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>:
> On 03/07/2012 12:49 PM, Barry Song wrote:
>>
>> 2012/3/7 Cong Wang<xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> On 03/07/2012 11:14 AM, Barry Song wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: Barry Song<Baohua.Song@csr.com>
>>>>
>>>> Any write request to /dev/cma_test will let the module to allocate
>>>> memory
>>>> from
>>>> CMA, for example:
>>>>
>>>> 1st time
>>>> $ echo 1024> ? ?/dev/cma_test
>>>> will require cma_test to request 1MB(1024KB)
>>>> 2nd time
>>>> $ echo 2048> ? ?/dev/cma_test
>>>> will require cma_test to request 2MB(2048KB)
>>>>
>>>> Any read request to /dev/cma_test will let the module to free the 1st
>>>> valid
>>>> memory from CMA, for example:
>>>>
>>>> 1st time
>>>> $ cat /dev/cma_test
>>>> will require cma_test to free the 1MB allocated in the first write
>>>> request
>>>> 2nd time
>>>> $ cat /dev/cma_test
>>>> will require cma_test to free the 2MB allocated in the second write
>>>> request
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Any reason why using /dev not /proc or /sys?
>>
>>
>> pls note it is just a test module to verify CMA at runtime. it is not
>> important either it is /dev, it is /proc or it is /sys.
>
>
> Why not important? You want it to be merged, don't you?
>
>
>>
>> any way to make things easier, we take that way.
>>
>
> Why /dev interface is easier than /proc and /sys? Confused, actually I think
> /proc or /sys should be easier...
if you think so, pls do that and send v4 with your s-o-b.
-barry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-07 4:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-07 3:14 [PATCH v3] MM: CMA: add a simple kernel module as the helper to test CMA Barry Song
2012-03-07 4:14 ` Cong Wang
2012-03-07 4:49 ` Barry Song
2012-03-07 4:55 ` Cong Wang
2012-03-07 4:57 ` Barry Song [this message]
2012-03-07 5:01 ` Cong Wang
2012-03-07 5:05 ` Barry Song
2012-03-07 5:09 ` Cong Wang
2012-03-07 5:17 ` Barry Song
2012-03-07 5:22 ` Cong Wang
2012-03-07 5:40 ` Barry Song
2012-03-07 10:38 ` Barry Song
2012-03-07 10:48 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2012-03-07 10:55 ` Barry Song
2012-03-07 10:59 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2012-03-07 11:12 ` Barry Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAGsJ_4xJoKGt3+b_3bteoMyeO615pCxFpMpsH4LtvufFNDv6bA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).