Re: [PATCH 3/7] dt-bindings: media: Document STM32MP25 VENC video encoder

From: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>
To: Hugues Fruchet <hugues.fruchet@foss.st.com>
Cc: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	 Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
	 linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	 devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	 Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] dt-bindings: media: Document STM32MP25 VENC video encoder
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 18:41:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHCN7xKrriTPaRMJ-r86cSgFDUUP1At08imLBr_zEP0g3fga_g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231004091552.3531659-4-hugues.fruchet@foss.st.com>

On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 4:16 AM Hugues Fruchet
<hugues.fruchet@foss.st.com> wrote:
>
> Add STM32MP25 VENC video encoder bindings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hugues Fruchet <hugues.fruchet@foss.st.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/media/st,stm32mp25-venc.yaml     | 56 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/st,stm32mp25-venc.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/st,stm32mp25-venc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/st,stm32mp25-venc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c69e0a34f675
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/st,stm32mp25-venc.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/media/st,stm32mp25-venc.yaml#

Can this dt-binding be made more generic, like something like
hantro-h1 or VC8000NanoE?

I think there will be more boards that may incorporate the Hantro-H1
or a VC8000 in the future, because I don't think this IP is unique to
the STM32MP25.

adam

> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: STMicroelectronics STM32MP25 VENC video encoder
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Hugues Fruchet <hugues.fruchet@foss.st.com>
> +
> +description:
> +  The STMicroelectronics STM32MP25 SOCs embeds a VENC video hardware encoder
> +  peripheral based on Verisilicon VC8000NanoE IP (former Hantro H1).
> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    const: st,stm32mp25-venc
> +
> +  reg:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  interrupts:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  interrupt-names:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  clocks:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +  clock-names:
> +    maxItems: 1
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +  - interrupts
> +  - interrupt-names
> +  - clocks
> +  - clock-names
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> +    venc: venc@580e0000 {
> +        compatible = "st,stm32mp25-venc";
> +        reg = <0x580e0000 0x800>;
> +        interrupts = <GIC_SPI 167 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +        interrupt-names = "venc";

Is the interrupt-names needed if there is only one?

> +        clocks = <&ck_icn_p_venc>;
> +        clock-names = "venc-clk";

Same thing for the clock.  if there is only one clock, doe they need names?

adam
> +    };
> --
> 2.25.1
>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel