From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pullip.cho@samsung.com (KyongHo Cho) Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 23:59:53 +0900 Subject: [PATCH v3 1/6] iommu/core: split mapping to page sizes as supported by the hardware In-Reply-To: References: <1316195506-9777-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <1316195506-9777-2-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <20110927100505.GH2138@amd.com> <20110927131222.GL2138@amd.com> <20110927181438.GM2138@amd.com> <20111010094738.GW2138@amd.com> <20111010153609.GB2138@amd.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > ?int iommu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova, > - ? ? ? ? ? ? phys_addr_t paddr, int gfp_order, int prot) > + ? ? ? ? ? ? phys_addr_t paddr, int size, int prot) > ?{ Even though it is not realistic that size becomes larger than 1 << ((sizeof(int) * 8) - 1), I think the type of size should be size_t. > - ? ? ? size_t size; > + ? ? ? unsigned long orig_iova = iova; > + ? ? ? int ret = 0, orig_size = size; > > ? ? ? ?if (unlikely(domain->ops->map == NULL)) > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?return -ENODEV; > > - ? ? ? size ? ? ? ? = PAGE_SIZE << gfp_order; > + ? ? ? /* > + ? ? ? ?* both the virtual address and the physical one, as well as > + ? ? ? ?* the size of the mapping, must be aligned (at least) to the > + ? ? ? ?* size of the smallest page supported by the hardware > + ? ? ? ?*/ > + ? ? ? if (!IS_ALIGNED(iova | paddr | size, domain->ops->min_pagesz)) { > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? pr_err("unaligned: iova 0x%lx pa 0x%lx size 0x%x min_pagesz " > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? "0x%x\n", iova, (unsigned long)paddr, > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? size, domain->ops->min_pagesz); > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? return -EINVAL; > + ? ? ? } > + > + ? ? ? pr_debug("map: iova 0x%lx pa 0x%lx size 0x%x\n", iova, > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (unsigned long)paddr, size); > + > + ? ? ? while (size) { > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? unsigned long pgsize, addr_merge = iova | paddr; > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? unsigned int pgsize_idx; > + > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? /* Max page size that still fits into 'size' */ > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? pgsize_idx = __fls(size); > + > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? /* need to consider alignment requirements ? */ > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (likely(addr_merge)) { > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? /* Max page size allowed by both iova and paddr */ > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? unsigned int align_pgsize_idx = __ffs(addr_merge); > + > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? pgsize_idx = min(pgsize_idx, align_pgsize_idx); > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? } > + > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? /* build a mask of acceptable page sizes */ > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? pgsize = (1UL << (pgsize_idx + 1)) - 1; > + > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? /* throw away page sizes not supported by the hardware */ > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? pgsize &= domain->ops->pgsize_bitmap; > + > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? /* make sure we're still sane */ > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? BUG_ON(!pgsize); > > - ? ? ? BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(iova | paddr, size)); > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? /* pick the biggest page */ > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? pgsize_idx = __fls(pgsize); > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? pgsize = 1UL << pgsize_idx; > > - ? ? ? return domain->ops->map(domain, iova, paddr, gfp_order, prot); > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? /* convert index to page order */ > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? pgsize_idx -= PAGE_SHIFT; > + > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? pr_debug("mapping: iova 0x%lx pa 0x%lx order %u\n", iova, > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (unsigned long)paddr, pgsize_idx); > + > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ret = domain->ops->map(domain, iova, paddr, pgsize_idx, prot); > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (ret) > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? break; > + > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? iova += pgsize; > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? paddr += pgsize; > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? size -= pgsize; > + ? ? ? } > + > + ? ? ? /* unroll mapping in case something went wrong */ > + ? ? ? if (ret) > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? iommu_unmap(domain, orig_iova, orig_size); > + domain->ops->map() might return error because a mapping already exists in the range from iova until iova + size. Thus, it should be iommu_unmap(domain, orig_iova, orig_size - size) Regards, KyongHo