linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: omar.ramirez@copitl.com (Omar Ramirez Luna)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the iommu tree
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 16:54:04 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJ6Av5OBhpsSRiZNOa1a65yMT04Evaja6j8qPBiSuVM1DPdB1Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK=WgbYDKN1deDTw3KvymvhoE1h_apX2E8zK=cDbu68+Gwcayw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi All,

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 03:42:03PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c between commit 298ea44f211d ("ARM:
>>> OMAP4: hwmod data: ipu and dsp to use parent clocks instead of leaf
>>> clocks") from the iommu tree and commit 13a5b6228679 ("ARM: OMAP44xx:
>>> clock: drop obsolete clock data") from the arm-soc tree.
>>>
>>> I just deleted the file as the latter did and can carry the fix as
>>> necessary (no action is required).
>>
>> Ohad, Omar, any comment on this?
>
> I'd prefer Omar or Paul to have a look here. Looping in Tony as well.

I have checked next-20121206, it's OK to delete that file as the patch
from Paul is doing that for common clock framework migration; now the
only missing hunk from my original patch should apply to
arch/arm/mach-omap2/cclock44xx_data.c which is the file that now has
ipu_fck and dsp_fck (unused) clocks, I can send a patch to remove them
through linux-omap tree.

Cheers,

Omar

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-06 22:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-04  4:42 linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the iommu tree Stephen Rothwell
2012-12-04 11:06 ` Joerg Roedel
2012-12-04 11:10   ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-12-06 22:54     ` Omar Ramirez Luna [this message]
2012-12-07  0:59       ` Paul Walmsley
2012-12-07  1:39         ` Omar Ramirez Luna
2012-12-07  1:40           ` Paul Walmsley
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-02-07  4:44 Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-07  4:48 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJ6Av5OBhpsSRiZNOa1a65yMT04Evaja6j8qPBiSuVM1DPdB1Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=omar.ramirez@copitl.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).