linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>
To: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,  Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	 Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/3] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Add helper function for the vpmu vcpu creation
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 15:30:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJHc60zNNsaALEV6XPdwuTZo1_0y2dT--MLMad0ar5Htt8jCtQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240619083200.1047073-2-shahuang@redhat.com>

Hi Shaoqin

On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 1:32 AM Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Create a vcpu with vpmu would be a common requirement for the vpmu test,
> so add the helper function for the vpmu vcpu creation. And use those
> helper function in the vpmu_counter_access.c test.
>
> Use this chance to delete the meaningless ASSERT about the pmuver,
> because KVM does not advertise an IMP_DEF PMU to guests.
>
> No functional changes intended.
>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>
> ---
>  .../kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c         | 32 ++++---------------
>  .../selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/vpmu.h      | 28 ++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/vpmu.h
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c
> index d31b9f64ba14..68da44198719 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>  #include <processor.h>
>  #include <test_util.h>
>  #include <vgic.h>
> +#include <vpmu.h>
>  #include <perf/arm_pmuv3.h>
>  #include <linux/bitfield.h>
>
> @@ -407,18 +408,8 @@ static void guest_code(uint64_t expected_pmcr_n)
>  /* Create a VM that has one vCPU with PMUv3 configured. */
>  static void create_vpmu_vm(void *guest_code)
>  {
> -       struct kvm_vcpu_init init;
> -       uint8_t pmuver, ec;
> -       uint64_t dfr0, irq = 23;
> -       struct kvm_device_attr irq_attr = {
> -               .group = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
> -               .attr = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ,
> -               .addr = (uint64_t)&irq,
> -       };
> -       struct kvm_device_attr init_attr = {
> -               .group = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
> -               .attr = KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT,
> -       };
> +       uint8_t ec;
> +       uint64_t irq = 23;
>
>         /* The test creates the vpmu_vm multiple times. Ensure a clean state */
>         memset(&vpmu_vm, 0, sizeof(vpmu_vm));
> @@ -430,26 +421,15 @@ static void create_vpmu_vm(void *guest_code)
>                                         guest_sync_handler);
>         }
>
> -       /* Create vCPU with PMUv3 */
> -       vm_ioctl(vpmu_vm.vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init);
> -       init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3);
> -       vpmu_vm.vcpu = aarch64_vcpu_add(vpmu_vm.vm, 0, &init, guest_code);
> +       vpmu_vm.vcpu = vm_vcpu_add_with_vpmu(vpmu_vm.vm, 0, guest_code);
>         vcpu_init_descriptor_tables(vpmu_vm.vcpu);
>         vpmu_vm.gic_fd = vgic_v3_setup(vpmu_vm.vm, 1, 64);
>         __TEST_REQUIRE(vpmu_vm.gic_fd >= 0,
>                        "Failed to create vgic-v3, skipping");
>
> -       /* Make sure that PMUv3 support is indicated in the ID register */
> -       vcpu_get_reg(vpmu_vm.vcpu,
> -                    KVM_ARM64_SYS_REG(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1), &dfr0);
> -       pmuver = FIELD_GET(ARM64_FEATURE_MASK(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer), dfr0);
> -       TEST_ASSERT(pmuver != ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_IMP_DEF &&
> -                   pmuver >= ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_IMP,
> -                   "Unexpected PMUVER (0x%x) on the vCPU with PMUv3", pmuver);
> -
>         /* Initialize vPMU */
> -       vcpu_ioctl(vpmu_vm.vcpu, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &irq_attr);
> -       vcpu_ioctl(vpmu_vm.vcpu, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &init_attr);
> +       vpmu_set_irq(vpmu_vm.vcpu, irq);
> +       vpmu_init(vpmu_vm.vcpu);
>  }
>
>  static void destroy_vpmu_vm(void)
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/vpmu.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/vpmu.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..5ef6cb011e41
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/vpmu.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +
> +#include <kvm_util.h>
> +
> +static inline struct kvm_vcpu *vm_vcpu_add_with_vpmu(struct kvm_vm *vm,
> +                                                    uint32_t vcpu_id,
> +                                                    void *guest_code)
> +{
> +       struct kvm_vcpu_init init;
> +
> +       /* Create vCPU with PMUv3 */
> +       vm_ioctl(vm, KVM_ARM_PREFERRED_TARGET, &init);
> +       init.features[0] |= (1 << KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3);
> +
> +       return aarch64_vcpu_add(vm, 0, &init, guest_code);
> +}
> +
> +static void vpmu_set_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int irq)
> +{
> +       kvm_device_attr_set(vcpu->fd, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
> +                           KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ, &irq);
> +}
> +
> +static void vpmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +       kvm_device_attr_set(vcpu->fd, KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL,
> +                           KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT, NULL);
> +}
> --
> 2.40.1
>
>
Reviewed-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>

- Raghavendra


  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-20 22:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-19  8:31 [PATCH v10 0/3] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Introduce pmu_event_filter_test Shaoqin Huang
2024-06-19  8:31 ` [PATCH v10 1/3] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Add helper function for the vpmu vcpu creation Shaoqin Huang
2024-06-20 22:30   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta [this message]
2024-06-19  8:31 ` [PATCH v10 2/3] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Introduce pmu_event_filter_test Shaoqin Huang
2024-06-20 22:26   ` Raghavendra Rao Ananta
2024-06-19  8:31 ` [PATCH v10 3/3] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Add invalid filter test in pmu_event_filter_test Shaoqin Huang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJHc60zNNsaALEV6XPdwuTZo1_0y2dT--MLMad0ar5Htt8jCtQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=rananta@google.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=shahuang@redhat.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).