From: krzk@kernel.org (Krzysztof Kozlowski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] lib/crc32: treewide: Use existing define with polynomial
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 08:33:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJKOXPdOrp07+YsEhsti6WLND6We2q_R=30cCWdaBgmEWkS5Ww@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180718001258.GA210746@gmail.com>
On 18 July 2018 at 02:12, Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 06:05:35PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Kernel defines same polynomial for CRC-32 in few places.
>> This is unnecessary duplication of the same value. Also this might
>> be error-prone for future code - every driver will define the
>> polynomial again.
>>
>> This is an attempt to unify definition of polynomial. Few obvious
>> hard-coded locations are fixed with define.
>>
>> All series depend on each 1/6 and 2/6.
>>
>> This could be merged in two different merge windows (1st lib/crc and then
>> the rest) or taken through one tree.
>>
>> It would be nice to get some testing. Only generic lib/crc, bunzip, xz_crc32
>> and Freescale's Ethernet driver were tested on HW. Rest got just different
>> builds.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
>> Krzysztof Kozlowski (6):
>> lib/crc: Move polynomial definition to separate header
>> lib/crc: Use consistent naming for CRC-32 polynomials
>> crypto: stm32_crc32 - Use existing define with polynomial
>> net: ethernet: Use existing define with polynomial
>> staging: rtl: Use existing define with polynomial
>> lib: Use existing define with polynomial
>>
>> drivers/crypto/stm32/stm32_crc32.c | 11 ++++-------
>> drivers/net/ethernet/amd/xgbe/xgbe-dev.c | 4 ++--
>> drivers/net/ethernet/apple/bmac.c | 8 ++------
>> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/tg3.c | 3 ++-
>> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c | 4 ++--
>> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fs_enet/fec.h | 3 ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fs_enet/mac-fec.c | 3 ++-
>> drivers/net/ethernet/micrel/ks8851_mll.c | 3 ++-
>> drivers/net/ethernet/synopsys/dwc-xlgmac-hw.c | 4 ++--
>> drivers/staging/rtl8712/rtl871x_security.c | 5 ++---
>> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_security.c | 5 ++---
>> include/linux/crc32poly.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> lib/crc32.c | 11 ++++++-----
>> lib/crc32defs.h | 14 --------------
>> lib/decompress_bunzip2.c | 3 ++-
>> lib/gen_crc32table.c | 5 +++--
>> lib/xz/xz_crc32.c | 3 ++-
>> 17 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 include/linux/crc32poly.h
>>
>
> Did you check whether any of these users can be converted to use the CRC
> implementations in lib/, so they wouldn't need the polynomial definition
> themselves?
I did not check but that's interesting point... The Ethernet drivers
(xgbe, tg3, fec, ks8851, dwc-xlgmac) look like could be converted to
generic implementation. The apple/bmac looks weird. The rtl WiFi
drivers in long term can be converted to use generic lib80211 for
encryption (see commit 0d4876f4e977 ("staging:r8188eu: Use lib80211 to
encrypt (TKIP) tx frames")) but that is much bigger task. The
remaining use the polynomials in different aspect:
1. XZ and BUNZIP use it to create CRC tables - probably generic
gen_crc32table.c could be used,
2. stm32_crc32.c uses it to initialize HW CRC accelerator.
I can work on Freescale FEC, xz and bunzip code because these I can
test but I would prefer to do it as follow up.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-18 6:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-17 16:05 [PATCH 0/6] lib/crc32: treewide: Use existing define with polynomial Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-07-17 16:05 ` [PATCH 1/6] lib/crc: Move polynomial definition to separate header Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-07-17 16:05 ` [PATCH 2/6] lib/crc: Use consistent naming for CRC-32 polynomials Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-07-17 16:05 ` [PATCH 3/6] crypto: stm32_crc32 - Use existing define with polynomial Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-07-17 16:05 ` [PATCH 4/6] net: ethernet: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-07-17 16:05 ` [PATCH 5/6] staging: rtl: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-07-17 16:05 ` [PATCH 6/6] lib: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-07-18 0:12 ` [PATCH 0/6] lib/crc32: treewide: " Eric Biggers
2018-07-18 6:33 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2018-07-27 16:05 ` Herbert Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJKOXPdOrp07+YsEhsti6WLND6We2q_R=30cCWdaBgmEWkS5Ww@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).