From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06440C83F1B for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 18:50:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=jkjzH5llnzdGVaYVn8ExLrRD8cDXLKU7uWJKF7ppC/Q=; b=kT5h+cTrj8ISwF1HB36FSJK3YK vajP8J6XFjUgjc6LVv1fp59Q5cZTduaiJq1hvBgvcXZkL0a6kidF43C8+Tsod2uB/w+5apKBlX00q s6iP0YTIcV4bi7XwWZ+pM4HcEBZ3Tph4H7jVXEnYCeNDLMoVL6Dlj2d4Wx+Q4mhNef85QYK4Xliwr k3hDgHItERB5tSBvecQZRadR9h+rcpsXrw/E9j6kUEE3QkGLOrh4p986ltwwNp3up+qeRBZvQrHEY Y1upo7t5f2LLxGiEfjaPx0J9euUAG0dzOCnd9Fq1gqhl9xwDx9VbU+RI7sY2ZYDSyDy+Wd1pJcwxL VOE4QsWQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ubOFs-000000034Xc-3NE9; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 18:50:24 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c0a:e001:78e:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ubN0b-00000002xvp-1vcU for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 17:30:34 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67DF2466A6 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 17:30:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F7CDC113D0 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 17:30:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1752514232; bh=XewLOYfqb/7YOskJSpnvvo/9VcSLIkCqEbvjb0MSFEE=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=vC3BlaM7f2IBlwpaGHoUkbNZRHgzwAXzEFSEpHaDofE+LDrxosQDKvHY4bEU2jJ5V hpD+ePz3X3cBR0VbtM7jCI+5JBSgzFiJVgmwK5FA+/zw4egBN0prmsXN7dpSpRA9bV Sl5841KwT9a0KuLIbDadQvy351QnkIx5ZpQULQ7UM66s9VGBB7JflEsi0cerg2ScCp tMvB0yJygsKorHVdiqXCfK2kSyVefetSPA2OD0d1Kpb6pw7P90B2AsHwYo/kyffPzz HuJzdX2/4RrBW50TgwfjCGyDnXE7h0J8qDwA/xWxphSt3s/nazOYSPscpjFJfda0q8 mGvAB0vJ81zfg== Received: by mail-oo1-f43.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-613a21f23cbso2107671eaf.1 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 10:30:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUAzqe9QsEAvnXgu/3txiXpun1ewvSmJ8O4HrfpAhNQNbrrgsD6GZG0Oh92ieNEG265crQmpouUdqnZDbGfqM5D@lists.infradead.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxJPTqtubCHNeSw2Ya2OsqKQP00x63WGpo+QNwRZDqO+PCbpD8h 2UkDhoHHdRdmnkwHwlwV5F+uOChyY9DZ8XbjrNV6fJzGAc28KAswBeKr9Zg6vg0OvhahzcG26vx s2TISiuo494WWBj1NiHyljocjNLu1hpg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG4gzTqDxo2kiaKUs9NT7jG7S74R8m7Mf4wFxMthg+jlzsnlgq3c8r8+igPvIkveiZL9WDapKKnPzYucmsi8/0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6820:4b0b:b0:611:75a8:f6ca with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-613e60042aemr9525757eaf.6.1752514231388; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 10:30:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20250404112050.42040-1-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> <20250404112050.42040-2-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com> <0c0bc332-0323-4e43-a96b-dd5f5957ecc9@huawei.com> <709ee8d2-8969-424c-b32b-101c6a8220fb@linux.alibaba.com> <353809e7-5373-0d54-6ddb-767bc5af9e5f@huawei.com> <653abdd4-46d2-4956-b49c-8f9c309af34d@linux.alibaba.com> <20250428152350.GA23615@willie-the-truck> <6671c3cc-5119-4544-bcb5-17e8cc2d7057@linux.alibaba.com> <3a465782-a8ff-4be8-9c15-e46f39196757@linux.alibaba.com> In-Reply-To: <3a465782-a8ff-4be8-9c15-e46f39196757@linux.alibaba.com> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 19:30:19 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: X-Gm-Features: Ac12FXyg6J3C22EsHHhK7h8dr6Kl_ZD1YWcAXSIJ5XogUO6kfZzV-U7v3B2lVCQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v18 1/2] ACPI: APEI: send SIGBUS to current task if synchronous memory error not recovered To: Shuai Xue Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Hanjun Guo , "Luck, Tony" , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, justin.he@arm.com, ardb@kernel.org, ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com, ashish.kalra@amd.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, tglx@linutronix.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, lenb@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, robert.moore@intel.com, lvying6@huawei.com, xiexiuqi@huawei.com, zhuo.song@linux.alibaba.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, yazen.ghannam@amd.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, mingo@redhat.com, robin.murphy@arm.com, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, bp@alien8.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, tanxiaofei@huawei.com, mawupeng1@huawei.com, linmiaohe@huawei.com, naoya.horiguchi@nec.com, james.morse@arm.com, tongtiangen@huawei.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jarkko@kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250714_103033_540379_EE29189C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 24.54 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi, On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 1:54=E2=80=AFPM Shuai Xue wrote: > > =E5=9C=A8 2025/7/1 21:56, Rafael J. Wysocki =E5=86=99=E9=81=93: > > On Tue, Jul 1, 2025 at 1:00=E2=80=AFPM Shuai Xue wrote: > >> > >> >=E5=9C=A8 2025/4/28 23:23, Will Deacon =E5=86=99=E9=81=93: > >> >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 09:10:09AM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote: > >> >>> =E5=9C=A8 2025/4/25 09:00, Hanjun Guo =E5=86=99=E9=81=93: > >> >>>> Call force_sig(SIGBUS) directly in ghes_do_proc() is not my fav= ourite, > >> >>>> but I can bear that, please add > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Thanks > >> >>>> Hanjun > >> >>> > >> >>> Thanks. Hanjun. > >> >>> > >> >>> @Rafael, @Catalin, > >> >>> > >> >>> Both patch 1 and 2 have reviewed-by tag from the arm64 ACPI > >> maintainers, Hanjun, > >> >>> now. Are you happpy to pick and queue this patch set to acpi tre= e > >> or arm tree? > >> >> > >> >> Since this primarily touches drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c, I think it= should > >> >> go via the ACPI tree and not the arm64 one. > >> >> > >> >> Will > >> > > >> >Hi, Will, > >> > > >> >Thank you for your confirmation :) > >> > > >> >@Rafael, do you have more comments on this patch set? > >> > > >> >Thanks you. > >> > > >> >Best Regards, > >> >Shuai > >> > >> Hi, all, > >> > >> Gentle ping. > >> > >> Does ACPI or APEI tree still active? Looking forward to any response. > > > > For APEI changes, you need an ACK from one of the reviewers listed in > > the MAINTAINERS entry for APEI. > > > > Thanks! > > Hi, Rafael > > Sorry, I missed your email which goes in span (: > > ARM maintain @Catalin points that: > > > James Morse is listed as reviewer of the ACPI APEI code but he's busy > > with resctrl/MPAM. Adding Lorenzo, Sudeep and Hanjun as arm64 ACPI > > maintainers, hopefully they can help. > > And Hanjun explictly gived his Reviewed-by tag in this thread, is that > happy for you for merge? Not really. I need an ACK or R-by from a reviewer listed in the APEI entry in MAINTAINE= RS. If James Morse is not able to fill that role (and AFAICS he's not been for quite some time now), I'd expect someone else to step up. Thanks!