From: thgarnie@google.com (Thomas Garnier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] arm/syscalls: Optimize address limit check
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 09:42:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJcbSZG1b7ObJAv6Kmp-fR3vZRg7AdbcgqDceGB95r-72Yv0yg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170814213732.104301-3-thgarnie@google.com>
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com> wrote:
> Disable the generic address limit check in favor of an architecture
> specific optimized implementation. The generic implementation using
> pending work flags did not work well with ARM and alignment faults.
>
> The address limit is checked on each syscall return path to user-mode
> path as well as the irq user-mode return function. If the address limit
> was changed, a function is called to report data corruption (stopping
> the kernel or process based on configuration).
>
> The address limit check has to be done before any pending work because
> they can reset the address limit and the process is killed using a
> SIGKILL signal. For example the lkdtm address limit check does not work
> because the signal to kill the process will reset the user-mode address
> limit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>
Any feedback?
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S | 11 +++++++++++
> arch/arm/kernel/signal.c | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S
> index 0b60adf4a5d9..99c908226065 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> #include <asm/unistd.h>
> #include <asm/ftrace.h>
> #include <asm/unwind.h>
> +#include <asm/memory.h>
> #ifdef CONFIG_AEABI
> #include <asm/unistd-oabi.h>
> #endif
> @@ -48,10 +49,14 @@ ret_fast_syscall:
> UNWIND(.fnstart )
> UNWIND(.cantunwind )
> disable_irq_notrace @ disable interrupts
> + ldr r2, [tsk, #TI_ADDR_LIMIT]
> + cmp r2, #TASK_SIZE
> + blne addr_limit_check_failed
> ldr r1, [tsk, #TI_FLAGS] @ re-check for syscall tracing
> tst r1, #_TIF_SYSCALL_WORK | _TIF_WORK_MASK
> bne fast_work_pending
>
> +
> /* perform architecture specific actions before user return */
> arch_ret_to_user r1, lr
>
> @@ -74,6 +79,9 @@ ret_fast_syscall:
> UNWIND(.cantunwind )
> str r0, [sp, #S_R0 + S_OFF]! @ save returned r0
> disable_irq_notrace @ disable interrupts
> + ldr r2, [tsk, #TI_ADDR_LIMIT]
> + cmp r2, #TASK_SIZE
> + blne addr_limit_check_failed
> ldr r1, [tsk, #TI_FLAGS] @ re-check for syscall tracing
> tst r1, #_TIF_SYSCALL_WORK | _TIF_WORK_MASK
> beq no_work_pending
> @@ -106,6 +114,9 @@ ENTRY(ret_to_user)
> ret_slow_syscall:
> disable_irq_notrace @ disable interrupts
> ENTRY(ret_to_user_from_irq)
> + ldr r2, [tsk, #TI_ADDR_LIMIT]
> + cmp r2, #TASK_SIZE
> + blne addr_limit_check_failed
> ldr r1, [tsk, #TI_FLAGS]
> tst r1, #_TIF_WORK_MASK
> bne slow_work_pending
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
> index 5814298ef0b7..b67ae12503f3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> #include <linux/tracehook.h>
> #include <linux/uprobes.h>
> +#include <linux/syscalls.h>
>
> #include <asm/elf.h>
> #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> @@ -673,3 +674,9 @@ struct page *get_signal_page(void)
>
> return page;
> }
> +
> +/* Defer to generic check */
> +asmlinkage void addr_limit_check_failed(void)
> +{
> + addr_limit_user_check();
> +}
> --
> 2.14.1.480.gb18f417b89-goog
>
--
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-22 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-14 21:37 [PATCH v3 1/4] syscalls: Use CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION for addr_limit_user_check Thomas Garnier
2017-08-14 21:37 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] Revert "arm/syscalls: Check address limit on user-mode return" Thomas Garnier
2017-08-14 21:37 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] arm/syscalls: Optimize address limit check Thomas Garnier
2017-08-22 16:42 ` Thomas Garnier [this message]
2017-08-29 14:32 ` Thomas Garnier
2017-08-29 19:54 ` Kees Cook
2017-09-05 10:46 ` Leonard Crestez
2017-08-14 21:37 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64/syscalls: Move address limit check in loop Thomas Garnier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJcbSZG1b7ObJAv6Kmp-fR3vZRg7AdbcgqDceGB95r-72Yv0yg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=thgarnie@google.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).