linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jaswinder.singh@linaro.org (Jassi Brar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: PL330: Don't call the callbacks if there isn't any active transfer
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:54:09 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJe_ZhftO+481BfL0ErEcM_brfmSuTXkTEniLRYxxM2T7OM2QA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABb+yY1atyLA8Ej57JBEM0JL3oK5e6+1vO0UH5VTNiBsKQPueA@mail.gmail.com>

On 15 November 2011 22:30, Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com> wrote:
>> On 15/11/11 07:51, Jassi Brar wrote:
>>>> There can be a stale struct pl330_req pointer from a previous run, but the
>>>> memory may be free already.
>>>>
>>> Sorry I am unable to fathom the scenario. The pl330_request_channel resets
>>> both pl330_req pointers. Maybe some real failure you saw, could help
>>> me understand.
>>
>> You request a channel, submit a xfer, it finishes successfully and
>> pl330_update() is called, which calls r->xfer_cb() and marks the request
>> as done by making req->mc_len = 0 . ?Then, if you call
>> pl330_release_channel(), _callback(thrd->req[0].r, PL330_ERR_ABORT) is
>> called and, as thrd_req[0].r and thrd_req[0].r->xfer_cb are not null,
>> r->xfer_cb() is called again. ?That's wrong, the xfer finished (maybe
>> long time ago) and the callback was called back then. ?You shouldn't
>> call it again with an error. ?You should only do so if the transfer was
>> running or scheduled to run, that's why I suggest calling _callback() if
>> !IS_FREE(req).
>>
> Usually flush is called before releasing the channel, which would
> have taken care of it. But I agree, flush shouldn't be necessary.
>
> MARK_FREE(_pl330_req) ?with _pl330_req.r != NULL ? doesn't look neat.
> So maybe we should move ? _pl330_req.r = NULL ? into MARK_FREE macro.
> Which would require moving 'struct list_head rqd' from _pl330_req to
> pl330_req, that should be ok though I think.
>
I think the following strikes just the right balance and should fix
the issue ...

diff --git a/arch/arm/common/pl330.c b/arch/arm/common/pl330.c
index 7129cfb..ecbca3f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/pl330.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/pl330.c
@@ -1480,13 +1480,19 @@ int pl330_update(const struct pl330_info *pi)

 	/* Now that we are in no hurry, do the callbacks */
 	while (!list_empty(&pl330->req_done)) {
+		struct pl330_req *r;
+
 		rqdone = container_of(pl330->req_done.next,
 					struct _pl330_req, rqd);

 		list_del_init(&rqdone->rqd);

+		/* Detach the req */
+		r = rqdone->r;
+		rqdone->r = NULL;
+
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pl330->lock, flags);
-		_callback(rqdone->r, PL330_ERR_NONE);
+		_callback(r, PL330_ERR_NONE);
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&pl330->lock, flags);
 	}
---
Thanks
-j

  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-16  6:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-02 14:30 [PATCH 1/4] ARM: PL330: Don't call the callbacks if there isn't any active transfer Javi Merino
2011-11-02 14:30 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: PL330: Only register usable channels Javi Merino
2011-11-15  8:48   ` Jassi Brar
2011-11-02 14:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: PL330: Fix the size of the dst_cache_ctrl field Javi Merino
2011-11-15  9:09   ` Jassi Brar
2011-11-02 14:30 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: PL330: Fix typo in _prepare_ccr() Javi Merino
2011-11-15  9:11   ` Jassi Brar
2011-11-15  7:51 ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM: PL330: Don't call the callbacks if there isn't any active transfer Jassi Brar
2011-11-15 15:51   ` Javi Merino
2011-11-15 17:00     ` Jassi Brar
2011-11-16  6:24       ` Jassi Brar [this message]
2011-11-22 17:16         ` Javi Merino
2011-11-23  9:46           ` Javi Merino

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJe_ZhftO+481BfL0ErEcM_brfmSuTXkTEniLRYxxM2T7OM2QA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jaswinder.singh@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).