From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ta.omasab@gmail.com (Thomas Abraham) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 23:31:20 +0900 Subject: [PATCH v11 4/6] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq driver for Exynos4210/5250/5420 In-Reply-To: References: <1413805281-6269-1-git-send-email-thomas.ab@samsung.com> <1413805281-6269-2-git-send-email-thomas.ab@samsung.com> <1413805281-6269-3-git-send-email-thomas.ab@samsung.com> <1413805281-6269-4-git-send-email-thomas.ab@samsung.com> <1413805281-6269-5-git-send-email-thomas.ab@samsung.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Kevin, On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 2:30 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 4:41 AM, Thomas Abraham wrote: >> The new CPU clock type allows the use of generic CPUfreq drivers. So for >> Exynos4210/5250, switch to using generic cpufreq driver. For Exynos5420, >> which did not have CPUfreq driver support, enable the use of generic >> CPUfreq driver. >> >> Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa >> Cc: Kukjin Kim >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham >> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa >> Tested-by: Javier Martinez Canillas >> Tested-by: Chander Kashyap > > What's the status of the exynos5 CPUfreq support for upstream? This > was pretty broadly reviewed and tested, but I still don't see this > either in linux-next or Kukjin's for-next. The rebased version of the patches have been posted [1]. My apologies for the delay in following up on this patch series. Thanks, Thomas. [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg380011.html > > Kevin > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel