From: Michael Shavit <mshavit@google.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>,
Moritz Fischer <moritzf@google.com>,
patches@lists.linux.dev,
Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 9/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add unit tests for arm_smmu_write_entry
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 22:34:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKHBV24_YDiH8D_jbfwKdoRRJAA17XLiCaAJ3ioS5f3FO1crrQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240418124852.GA3050601@nvidia.com>
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 8:49 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 12:39:29PM +0800, Michael Shavit wrote:
> > > > Forgot that my SVA sanity doesn't cover this patch. And it looks
> > > > like some problems here when building it with "=m":
> > > >
> > > > ERROR: modpost: missing MODULE_LICENSE() in drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.o
> > > > ERROR: modpost: "arm_smmu_make_cdtable_ste" [drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.ko] undefined!
> > > > ERROR: modpost: "arm_smmu_make_bypass_ste" [drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.ko] undefined!
> > > > ERROR: modpost: "arm_smmu_make_abort_ste" [drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.ko] undefined!
> > > > ERROR: modpost: "arm_smmu_make_s2_domain_ste" [drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.ko] undefined!
> > > > ERROR: modpost: "arm_smmu_get_ste_used" [drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.ko] undefined!
> > > > ERROR: modpost: "arm_smmu_write_entry" [drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-test.ko] undefined!
> > > >
> > > > Likely needs MODULE_LICENSE and some EXPORT_SYMBOLs.
> > >
> > > Oh! The kbuild never tested this kconfig combination...
> > >
> > > I think just this? Michael?
> >
> > Urhh I'm not sure... Should this also depend on ARM_SMMU_V3?
>
> It does:
>
> if ARM_SMMU_V3
> config ARM_SMMU_V3_SVA
> bool "Shared Virtual Addressing support for the ARM SMMUv3"
> select IOMMU_SVA
> select IOMMU_IOPF
> select MMU_NOTIFIER
> help
> Support for sharing process address spaces with devices using the
> SMMUv3.
>
> Say Y here if your system supports SVA extensions such as PCIe PASID
> and PRI.
>
> config ARM_SMMU_V3_KUNIT_TEST
> bool "KUnit tests for arm-smmu-v3 driver" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> depends on KUNIT
> default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> help
> Enable this option to unit-test arm-smmu-v3 driver functions.
>
> If unsure, say N.
> endif
>
> The 'if' creates an automatic dependency and groups things into a
> kconfig menu
Ohhh, I should have looked more carefully :) . Thanks.
>
> > Also what
> > happens if ARM_SMMU_V3=m and ARM_SMMU_V3_KUNIT_TEST=y ?
>
> Works fine, the kunit symbols are exported and we still build one
> module for smmu so we don't need to have internal cross-module stuff
>
> Jason
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-18 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-16 19:28 [PATCH v7 0/9] Make the SMMUv3 CD logic match the new STE design (part 2a/3) Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-16 19:28 ` [PATCH v7 1/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add an ops indirection to the STE code Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-16 20:18 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-04-19 21:02 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-22 13:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-16 19:28 ` [PATCH v7 2/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Make CD programming use arm_smmu_write_entry() Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-16 20:48 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-04-18 13:01 ` Robin Murphy
2024-04-18 16:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-19 21:07 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-22 13:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-27 22:08 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-29 14:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-29 15:30 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-16 19:28 ` [PATCH v7 3/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move the CD generation for S1 domains into a function Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-16 21:22 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-04-19 21:10 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-22 13:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-16 19:28 ` [PATCH v7 4/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Consolidate clearing a CD table entry Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-16 19:28 ` [PATCH v7 5/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Make arm_smmu_alloc_cd_ptr() Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-16 22:19 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-04-19 21:14 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-22 14:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-27 22:19 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-29 14:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-29 14:47 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-29 14:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-16 19:28 ` [PATCH v7 6/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Allocate the CD table entry in advance Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-16 19:28 ` [PATCH v7 7/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move the CD generation for SVA into a function Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-17 7:37 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-04-17 13:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-17 16:25 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-04-17 16:26 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-04-18 4:40 ` Michael Shavit
2024-04-18 14:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-16 19:28 ` [PATCH v7 8/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Build the whole CD in arm_smmu_make_s1_cd() Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-17 7:43 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-04-16 19:28 ` [PATCH v7 9/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add unit tests for arm_smmu_write_entry Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-17 8:09 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-04-17 14:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-17 16:13 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-04-18 4:39 ` Michael Shavit
2024-04-18 12:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-18 14:34 ` Michael Shavit [this message]
2024-04-19 21:24 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-22 14:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-04-27 22:33 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-04-16 19:40 ` [PATCH v7 0/9] Make the SMMUv3 CD logic match the new STE design (part 2a/3) Nicolin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKHBV24_YDiH8D_jbfwKdoRRJAA17XLiCaAJ3ioS5f3FO1crrQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mshavit@google.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mdf@kernel.org \
--cc=moritzf@google.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).