From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: elezegarcia@gmail.com (Ezequiel Garcia) Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:57:44 -0300 Subject: [PATCH 5/9] ARM: dts: Add GPMC node for OMAP2, OMAP4 and OMAP5 In-Reply-To: <5141F1C3.6090009@ti.com> References: <1362763654-9660-1-git-send-email-jon-hunter@ti.com> <1362763654-9660-6-git-send-email-jon-hunter@ti.com> <513A5B23.5070302@ti.com> <513E1ADC.6030208@ti.com> <5141F07E.3030501@ti.com> <5141F1C3.6090009@ti.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: >> Yes, I full agree with that as well. The size should be purely HW >> related. So we should not take any assumption about the page size / >> alignment. > > Ok, what is best to use? The size from hwmod structures or the size from > the documentation? > My personal vote is: according to hardware documentation is the right thing, and it's what we're doing in mvebu. -- Ezequiel