[PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: Clear OF_POPULATED flag from PMU node in IRQ init callback

[PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: Clear OF_POPULATED flag from PMU node in IRQ init callback

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

The Exynos PMU node is an interrupt, clock and PMU (Power Management Unit)
controller, and these functionalities are supported by different drivers
that matches the same compatible strings.

Since commit 15cc2ed6dcf9 ("of/irq: Mark initialised interrupt controllers
as populated") the OF core flags interrupt controllers registered with the
IRQCHIP_DECLARE() macro as OF_POPULATED, so platform devices with the same
compatible string as the interrupt controller will not be registered.

This prevents the PMU platform device to be registered so the Exynos PMU
driver is never probed. This breaks (among other things) Suspend-to-RAM.

Fix this by clearing the OF_POPULATED flag in the PMU IRQ init callback,
to allow the Exynos PMU platform driver to be probed. The patch is based
on Philipp Zabel's "ARM: imx6: mark GPC node as not populated after irq
init to probe pm domain driver".

Fixes: 15cc2ed6dcf9 ("of/irq: Mark initialised interrupt controllers as populated")
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>

---

This was tested on an Exynos5800 Peach Pi Chromebook with v4.8-rc2 +
Philipp's patch: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9271361/

 arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c
index 3750575c73c5..06332f626565 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c
@@ -255,6 +255,12 @@ static int __init exynos_pmu_irq_init(struct device_node *node,
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * Clear the OF_POPULATED flag set in of_irq_init so that
+	 * later the Exynos PMU platform device won't be skipped.
+	 */
+	of_node_clear_flag(node, OF_POPULATED);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.5.5

[PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: Clear OF_POPULATED flag from PMU node in IRQ init callback

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 03:27:45AM -0400, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The Exynos PMU node is an interrupt, clock and PMU (Power Management Unit)
> controller, and these functionalities are supported by different drivers
> that matches the same compatible strings.
> 
> Since commit 15cc2ed6dcf9 ("of/irq: Mark initialised interrupt controllers
> as populated") the OF core flags interrupt controllers registered with the
> IRQCHIP_DECLARE() macro as OF_POPULATED, so platform devices with the same
> compatible string as the interrupt controller will not be registered.
> 
> This prevents the PMU platform device to be registered so the Exynos PMU
> driver is never probed. This breaks (among other things) Suspend-to-RAM.
> 
> Fix this by clearing the OF_POPULATED flag in the PMU IRQ init callback,
> to allow the Exynos PMU platform driver to be probed. The patch is based
> on Philipp Zabel's "ARM: imx6: mark GPC node as not populated after irq
> init to probe pm domain driver".
> 
> Fixes: 15cc2ed6dcf9 ("of/irq: Mark initialised interrupt controllers as populated")
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> This was tested on an Exynos5800 Peach Pi Chromebook with v4.8-rc2 +
> Philipp's patch: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9271361/
> 
>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c
> index 3750575c73c5..06332f626565 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c
> @@ -255,6 +255,12 @@ static int __init exynos_pmu_irq_init(struct device_node *node,
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Clear the OF_POPULATED flag set in of_irq_init so that
> +	 * later the Exynos PMU platform device won't be skipped.
> +	 */
> +	of_node_clear_flag(node, OF_POPULATED);
> +

Looks like a proper workaround (at least till of_irq_init sets this flag
before calling irq_init_cb()) however I have some more doubts:

1. The commit 15cc2ed6dcf9 ("of/irq: Mark initialised interrupt
controllers as populated") might be also applied to clock CLK_OF_DECLARE
and the problem will appear again.

2. We are reusing PMU compatible for irqcip, clock provider and a
platform driver. This is one PMU block with many features thus many
drivers were created. What happens if the Exynos platform driver
(drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.c) binds before irqchip or clk provider?
Probably we should not reuse the compatible but create a new one for
each type of driver? How does it match DeviceTree?

Javier, Rob, any hints on that? Best practices, suggestions for future?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

[PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: Clear OF_POPULATED flag from PMU node in IRQ init callback

[Rob Herring]

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 03:27:45AM -0400, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> The Exynos PMU node is an interrupt, clock and PMU (Power Management Unit)
>> controller, and these functionalities are supported by different drivers
>> that matches the same compatible strings.
>>
>> Since commit 15cc2ed6dcf9 ("of/irq: Mark initialised interrupt controllers
>> as populated") the OF core flags interrupt controllers registered with the
>> IRQCHIP_DECLARE() macro as OF_POPULATED, so platform devices with the same
>> compatible string as the interrupt controller will not be registered.
>>
>> This prevents the PMU platform device to be registered so the Exynos PMU
>> driver is never probed. This breaks (among other things) Suspend-to-RAM.
>>
>> Fix this by clearing the OF_POPULATED flag in the PMU IRQ init callback,
>> to allow the Exynos PMU platform driver to be probed. The patch is based
>> on Philipp Zabel's "ARM: imx6: mark GPC node as not populated after irq
>> init to probe pm domain driver".
>>
>> Fixes: 15cc2ed6dcf9 ("of/irq: Mark initialised interrupt controllers as populated")
>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> This was tested on an Exynos5800 Peach Pi Chromebook with v4.8-rc2 +
>> Philipp's patch: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9271361/
>>
>>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c | 6 ++++++
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c
>> index 3750575c73c5..06332f626565 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c
>> @@ -255,6 +255,12 @@ static int __init exynos_pmu_irq_init(struct device_node *node,
>>               return -ENOMEM;
>>       }
>>
>> +     /*
>> +      * Clear the OF_POPULATED flag set in of_irq_init so that
>> +      * later the Exynos PMU platform device won't be skipped.
>> +      */
>> +     of_node_clear_flag(node, OF_POPULATED);
>> +
>
> Looks like a proper workaround (at least till of_irq_init sets this flag
> before calling irq_init_cb()) however I have some more doubts:
>
> 1. The commit 15cc2ed6dcf9 ("of/irq: Mark initialised interrupt
> controllers as populated") might be also applied to clock CLK_OF_DECLARE
> and the problem will appear again.

We now know what to look for...

> 2. We are reusing PMU compatible for irqcip, clock provider and a
> platform driver. This is one PMU block with many features thus many
> drivers were created. What happens if the Exynos platform driver
> (drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.c) binds before irqchip or clk provider?

It can't. OF_DECLARE calls happen before initcalls*.

*I did find that IOMMU's are during initcalls which in my opinion is
wrong. But I think there is some plan to fix them to support deferred
probe and that should go away.

> Probably we should not reuse the compatible but create a new one for
> each type of driver? How does it match DeviceTree?

No, compatible strings are for h/w blocks, not drivers. Now, if you
need multiple platform drivers, then you should have 1 parent
device/driver that's bound from DT, then it can create any child
devices for specific functions.

Rob

[PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: Clear OF_POPULATED flag from PMU node in IRQ init callback

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:57:29PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 03:27:45AM -0400, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> >> The Exynos PMU node is an interrupt, clock and PMU (Power Management Unit)
> >> controller, and these functionalities are supported by different drivers
> >> that matches the same compatible strings.
> >>
> >> Since commit 15cc2ed6dcf9 ("of/irq: Mark initialised interrupt controllers
> >> as populated") the OF core flags interrupt controllers registered with the
> >> IRQCHIP_DECLARE() macro as OF_POPULATED, so platform devices with the same
> >> compatible string as the interrupt controller will not be registered.
> >>
> >> This prevents the PMU platform device to be registered so the Exynos PMU
> >> driver is never probed. This breaks (among other things) Suspend-to-RAM.
> >>
> >> Fix this by clearing the OF_POPULATED flag in the PMU IRQ init callback,
> >> to allow the Exynos PMU platform driver to be probed. The patch is based
> >> on Philipp Zabel's "ARM: imx6: mark GPC node as not populated after irq
> >> init to probe pm domain driver".
> >>
> >> Fixes: 15cc2ed6dcf9 ("of/irq: Mark initialised interrupt controllers as populated")
> >> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> This was tested on an Exynos5800 Peach Pi Chromebook with v4.8-rc2 +
> >> Philipp's patch: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9271361/
> >>
> >>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c | 6 ++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c
> >> index 3750575c73c5..06332f626565 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/suspend.c
> >> @@ -255,6 +255,12 @@ static int __init exynos_pmu_irq_init(struct device_node *node,
> >>               return -ENOMEM;
> >>       }
> >>
> >> +     /*
> >> +      * Clear the OF_POPULATED flag set in of_irq_init so that
> >> +      * later the Exynos PMU platform device won't be skipped.
> >> +      */
> >> +     of_node_clear_flag(node, OF_POPULATED);
> >> +
> >
> > Looks like a proper workaround (at least till of_irq_init sets this flag
> > before calling irq_init_cb()) however I have some more doubts:
> >
> > 1. The commit 15cc2ed6dcf9 ("of/irq: Mark initialised interrupt
> > controllers as populated") might be also applied to clock CLK_OF_DECLARE
> > and the problem will appear again.
> 
> We now know what to look for...

D'oh!

If you gonna apply this to clock providers, please let us know (or apply
workaround to drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos-clkout.c).

> 
> > 2. We are reusing PMU compatible for irqcip, clock provider and a
> > platform driver. This is one PMU block with many features thus many
> > drivers were created. What happens if the Exynos platform driver
> > (drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.c) binds before irqchip or clk provider?
> 
> It can't. OF_DECLARE calls happen before initcalls*.
> 
> *I did find that IOMMU's are during initcalls which in my opinion is
> wrong. But I think there is some plan to fix them to support deferred
> probe and that should go away.
> 
> > Probably we should not reuse the compatible but create a new one for
> > each type of driver? How does it match DeviceTree?
> 
> No, compatible strings are for h/w blocks, not drivers. Now, if you
> need multiple platform drivers, then you should have 1 parent
> device/driver that's bound from DT, then it can create any child
> devices for specific functions.

Thanks for explanation.

For the Javier's patch itself, applied.

Best regards,
Krzysztof