From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Shilimkar, Santosh) Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 11:50:04 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 00/18][V3] ARM: OMAP3/4 : cpuidle34xx and cpuidle44xx cleanups In-Reply-To: <4F9FB8F0.80901@linaro.org> References: <1335276339-11135-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <4F98740F.1020402@linaro.org> <87vckgltdg.fsf@ti.com> <4F9F9BC1.9020908@linaro.org> <4F9FB8F0.80901@linaro.org> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 05/01/2012 11:55 AM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: >> >> On May 1, 2012 1:46 PM, "Daniel Lezcano" >> ?wrote: >>> >>> On 05/01/2012 12:58 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote: >>>> >>>> Daniel Lezcano ? writes: >>>> >>>>> On 04/24/2012 04:05 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> This patchset makes some cleanup on these cpuidle drivers >>>>>> and consolidate the code across both architecture. >>>>>> >>>>>> Tested on OMAP3 (igepV2). >>>>>> Partially tested on OMAP4 (pandaboard), without offlining the cpu1. >>>> >>>> >>>> Without offlining CPU1, none of this code is executed. ?Can you test >>>> with CPU1 offlined? >>> >>> >>> Unfortunately my OMAP4 board burned :/ I am waiting for a new one. >>> Rob tested the series but when he unplugged the cpu1, the kernel panics >> >> for another reason. I guess the problem should have been fixed since the >> last testing. >>> >>> ?Rob ? Do you mind the test the series again, the problem you were facing >> >> when unplugging the cpu1 may have been fixed. >> Have already tested this series on omap4 with cpu offline as well as with >> couple idle series on top of it. >> I haven't finished omap3 testing and hence not reported yet. Omap4 >> continies to work with subject series. > > > Great ! > > I tested it on omap3 igepv2 board and it works fine too. > Finished OMAP3 testing too. have already reviewed the series before. For entire series, Reviewed-tested-by: Santosh Shilimkar Regards Santosh