From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Shilimkar, Santosh) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 14:34:09 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: OMAP2+: 32k-counter: Use hwmod lookup to check presence of 32k timer In-Reply-To: <79CD15C6BA57404B839C016229A409A8318461E8@DBDE01.ent.ti.com> References: <1326983304-14619-1-git-send-email-hvaibhav@ti.com> <4F672364.3020403@ti.com> <79CD15C6BA57404B839C016229A409A83182386C@DBDE01.ent.ti.com> <79CD15C6BA57404B839C016229A409A83183EA54@DBDE01.ent.ti.com> <79CD15C6BA57404B839C016229A409A83183EB47@DBDE01.ent.ti.com> <79CD15C6BA57404B839C016229A409A831840C2E@DBDE01.ent.ti.com> <79CD15C6BA57404B839C016229A409A831840E0C@DBDE01.ent.ti.com> <4F7570FC.8000907@ti.com> <79CD15C6BA57404B839C016229A409A831840F82@DBDE01.ent.ti.com> <87sjgmt211.fsf@ti.com> <79CD15C6BA57404B839C016229A409A8318461E8@DBDE01.ent.ti.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 00:05:38, Hilman, Kevin wrote: >> "Shilimkar, Santosh" writes: >> >> [...] >> >> > I don't personally like to add features which hardly anybody use and >> > fundamentally broken with full kernel. >> >> Let's keep sane defaults, but not make it unreasonable to tweak eaither. >> >> I suggest what has already been mentioned. >> >> Register both timers, but have the sync timer have a higher rating. ?On >> AMxxx where there is no sync timer, GPtimer will be used. >> > > This is another good option, I can change the rating of both the timers. > With below description and given understanding/discussion/usability of both > the timers, we can reverse the rating, > Btw, if we are going with this path, then there won't any need of commandline option since clock-source can be switched from user space as well. Regards santosh