From: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
To: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
Cc: Daniele Castagna <dcastagna@chromium.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Fritz Koenig <frkoenig@chromium.org>,
Miguel Casas <mcasas@chromium.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Mark Yacoub <markyacoub@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] drm/mediatek: Support 180 degree rotation
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 09:42:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMavQKJ+_+fytidjp4WvMwSrytJO_aU+57a54h1ACAqPHp3e7A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1573031243.15410.2.camel@mtksdaap41>
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 4:07 AM CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Sean:
>
> On Tue, 2019-11-05 at 16:10 -0500, Sean Paul wrote:
> > From: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
> >
> > Now that we support both reflections, we can expose 180 degree rotation
> > and rely on the simplify routine to convert that into REFLECT_X |
> > REFLECT_Y
> >
>
> Patch 1 ~ 6 of this series looks good to me.
> For this one, I think the rotation check in mtk_ovl_layer_check() should
> be modified.
>
Thanks for the quick reviews, CK!
In what way would you like the check to be modified? I'm guessing
you're asking that I add it to the bitmask passed to the
simplify_rotation function?
If that's the case, we don't actually want to modify the
simplify_rotation bitmask since that bitmask is supposed to be only
the rotations that the hardware can achieve. So if you pass ROTATE_180
into simplify_rotation, it will return REFLECT_X | REFLECT_Y, which is
what we want. Does that make sense, or am I missing something?
Thanks,
Sean
> Regards,
> CK
>
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c
> > index f4c4d3fedc5f..4a55bb6e2213 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c
> > @@ -143,8 +143,8 @@ static unsigned int mtk_ovl_layer_nr(struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp)
> >
> > static unsigned int mtk_ovl_supported_rotations(struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp)
> > {
> > - return DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0 | DRM_MODE_REFLECT_Y |
> > - DRM_MODE_REFLECT_X;
> > + return DRM_MODE_ROTATE_0 | DRM_MODE_ROTATE_180 |
> > + DRM_MODE_REFLECT_X | DRM_MODE_REFLECT_Y;
> > }
> >
> > static int mtk_ovl_layer_check(struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp, unsigned int idx,
>
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-06 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-05 21:10 [PATCH v2 0/7] drm/mediatek: Refactor plane init/check and support rotation Sean Paul
2019-11-05 21:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] drm/mediatek: Refactor plane init Sean Paul
2019-11-05 21:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] drm/mediatek: Add helper to get component for a plane Sean Paul
2019-11-05 21:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] drm/mediatek: Add plumbing for layer_check hook Sean Paul
2019-11-05 21:10 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] drm/mediatek: Plumb supported rotation values from components to plane init Sean Paul
2019-11-05 21:10 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] drm/mediatek: Support reflect-y plane rotation Sean Paul
2019-11-05 21:10 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] drm/mediatek: Support reflect-x " Sean Paul
2019-11-05 21:10 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] drm/mediatek: Support 180 degree rotation Sean Paul
2019-11-06 9:07 ` CK Hu
2019-11-06 14:42 ` Sean Paul [this message]
2019-11-07 1:38 ` CK Hu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMavQKJ+_+fytidjp4WvMwSrytJO_aU+57a54h1ACAqPHp3e7A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sean@poorly.run \
--cc=ck.hu@mediatek.com \
--cc=dcastagna@chromium.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=frkoenig@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=markyacoub@google.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=mcasas@chromium.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).