* [PATCH 1/9] ARM: dts: emev2: update PFC node name to pin-controller
2017-04-26 10:05 [PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: renesas: update PFC node name to pin-controller Simon Horman
@ 2017-04-26 10:05 ` Simon Horman
2017-04-26 10:05 ` [PATCH 2/9] ARM: dts: r8a73a4: " Simon Horman
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2017-04-26 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e0140200.pfc and pfc at e0140200 to
e0140200.pin-controller and pin-controller at e0140200.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/emev2.dtsi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/emev2.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/emev2.dtsi
index 0124faf175c8..42ea246e71cb 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/emev2.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/emev2.dtsi
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@
clock-names = "sclk";
};
- pfc: pfc at e0140200 {
+ pfc: pin-controller at e0140200 {
compatible = "renesas,pfc-emev2";
reg = <0xe0140200 0x100>;
};
--
2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/9] ARM: dts: r8a73a4: update PFC node name to pin-controller
2017-04-26 10:05 [PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: renesas: update PFC node name to pin-controller Simon Horman
2017-04-26 10:05 ` [PATCH 1/9] ARM: dts: emev2: " Simon Horman
@ 2017-04-26 10:05 ` Simon Horman
2017-04-26 10:05 ` [PATCH 3/9] ARM: dts: r8a7740: " Simon Horman
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2017-04-26 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e6050000.pfc and pfc at e6050000 to
e6050000.pin-controller and pin-controller at e6050000.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a73a4.dtsi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a73a4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a73a4.dtsi
index 1f5c9f6dddba..310222634570 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a73a4.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a73a4.dtsi
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@
power-domains = <&pd_c4>;
};
- pfc: pfc at e6050000 {
+ pfc: pin-controller at e6050000 {
compatible = "renesas,pfc-r8a73a4";
reg = <0 0xe6050000 0 0x9000>;
gpio-controller;
--
2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [PATCH 3/9] ARM: dts: r8a7740: update PFC node name to pin-controller
2017-04-26 10:05 [PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: renesas: update PFC node name to pin-controller Simon Horman
2017-04-26 10:05 ` [PATCH 1/9] ARM: dts: emev2: " Simon Horman
2017-04-26 10:05 ` [PATCH 2/9] ARM: dts: r8a73a4: " Simon Horman
@ 2017-04-26 10:05 ` Simon Horman
2017-04-26 10:05 ` [PATCH 4/9] ARM: dts: r8a7778: " Simon Horman
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2017-04-26 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e6050000.pfc and pfc at e6050000 to
e6050000.pin-controller and pin-controller at e6050000.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7740.dtsi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7740.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7740.dtsi
index 34159a8349de..d37d22682a63 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7740.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7740.dtsi
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@
status = "disabled";
};
- pfc: pfc at e6050000 {
+ pfc: pin-controller at e6050000 {
compatible = "renesas,pfc-r8a7740";
reg = <0xe6050000 0x8000>,
<0xe605800c 0x20>;
--
2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [PATCH 4/9] ARM: dts: r8a7778: update PFC node name to pin-controller
2017-04-26 10:05 [PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: renesas: update PFC node name to pin-controller Simon Horman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2017-04-26 10:05 ` [PATCH 3/9] ARM: dts: r8a7740: " Simon Horman
@ 2017-04-26 10:05 ` Simon Horman
2017-04-26 10:05 ` [PATCH 5/9] ARM: dts: r8a7779: " Simon Horman
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2017-04-26 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from fffc0000.pfc and pfc at fffc0000 to
fffc0000.pin-controller and pin-controller at fffc0000.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778.dtsi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778.dtsi
index 1e93c94a9eac..8f3156c0e575 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7778.dtsi
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@
interrupt-controller;
};
- pfc: pfc at fffc0000 {
+ pfc: pin-controller at fffc0000 {
compatible = "renesas,pfc-r8a7778";
reg = <0xfffc0000 0x118>;
};
--
2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [PATCH 5/9] ARM: dts: r8a7779: update PFC node name to pin-controller
2017-04-26 10:05 [PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: renesas: update PFC node name to pin-controller Simon Horman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2017-04-26 10:05 ` [PATCH 4/9] ARM: dts: r8a7778: " Simon Horman
@ 2017-04-26 10:05 ` Simon Horman
2017-04-26 10:05 ` [PATCH 6/9] ARM: dts: r8a7790: " Simon Horman
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2017-04-26 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from fffc0000.pfc and pfc at fffc0000 to
fffc0000.pin-controller and pin-controller at fffc0000.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7779.dtsi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7779.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7779.dtsi
index ae2d9a9c65af..8ee0b2ca5d39 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7779.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7779.dtsi
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@
status = "disabled";
};
- pfc: pfc at fffc0000 {
+ pfc: pin-controller at fffc0000 {
compatible = "renesas,pfc-r8a7779";
reg = <0xfffc0000 0x23c>;
};
--
2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [PATCH 6/9] ARM: dts: r8a7790: update PFC node name to pin-controller
2017-04-26 10:05 [PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: renesas: update PFC node name to pin-controller Simon Horman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2017-04-26 10:05 ` [PATCH 5/9] ARM: dts: r8a7779: " Simon Horman
@ 2017-04-26 10:05 ` Simon Horman
2017-04-26 10:05 ` [PATCH 7/9] ARM: dts: r8a7791: " Simon Horman
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2017-04-26 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e6060000.pfc and pfc at e6060000 to
e6060000.pin-controller and pin-controller at e6060000.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi
index 99269aaca6fc..416956a42c93 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi
@@ -614,7 +614,7 @@
max-frequency = <97500000>;
};
- pfc: pfc at e6060000 {
+ pfc: pin-controller at e6060000 {
compatible = "renesas,pfc-r8a7790";
reg = <0 0xe6060000 0 0x250>;
};
--
2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [PATCH 7/9] ARM: dts: r8a7791: update PFC node name to pin-controller
2017-04-26 10:05 [PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: renesas: update PFC node name to pin-controller Simon Horman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2017-04-26 10:05 ` [PATCH 6/9] ARM: dts: r8a7790: " Simon Horman
@ 2017-04-26 10:05 ` Simon Horman
2017-04-26 10:05 ` [PATCH 8/9] ARM: dts: r8a7793: " Simon Horman
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2017-04-26 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e6060000.pfc and pfc at e6060000 to
e6060000.pin-controller and pin-controller at e6060000.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi
index 4d0c2ce59900..540c5b27b842 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi
@@ -562,7 +562,7 @@
status = "disabled";
};
- pfc: pfc at e6060000 {
+ pfc: pin-controller at e6060000 {
compatible = "renesas,pfc-r8a7791";
reg = <0 0xe6060000 0 0x250>;
};
--
2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [PATCH 8/9] ARM: dts: r8a7793: update PFC node name to pin-controller
2017-04-26 10:05 [PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: renesas: update PFC node name to pin-controller Simon Horman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2017-04-26 10:05 ` [PATCH 7/9] ARM: dts: r8a7791: " Simon Horman
@ 2017-04-26 10:05 ` Simon Horman
2017-04-26 10:05 ` [PATCH 9/9] ARM: dts: sh73a0: " Simon Horman
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2017-04-26 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e6060000.pfc and pfc at e6060000 to
e6060000.pin-controller and pin-controller at e6060000.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793.dtsi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793.dtsi
index 4de6041d61f9..728b5bca5bdb 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793.dtsi
@@ -529,7 +529,7 @@
status = "disabled";
};
- pfc: pfc at e6060000 {
+ pfc: pin-controller at e6060000 {
compatible = "renesas,pfc-r8a7793";
reg = <0 0xe6060000 0 0x250>;
};
--
2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [PATCH 9/9] ARM: dts: sh73a0: update PFC node name to pin-controller
2017-04-26 10:05 [PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: renesas: update PFC node name to pin-controller Simon Horman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2017-04-26 10:05 ` [PATCH 8/9] ARM: dts: r8a7793: " Simon Horman
@ 2017-04-26 10:05 ` Simon Horman
2017-04-26 11:20 ` [PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: renesas: " Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-05-03 8:11 ` Simon Horman
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2017-04-26 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
logs, and sysfs entries change from e6050000.pfc and pfc at e6050000 to
e6050000.pin-controller and pin-controller at e6050000.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi
index 6b01ab354e88..4ea5c5a16c57 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sh73a0.dtsi
@@ -444,7 +444,7 @@
status = "disabled";
};
- pfc: pfc at e6050000 {
+ pfc: pin-controller at e6050000 {
compatible = "renesas,pfc-sh73a0";
reg = <0xe6050000 0x8000>,
<0xe605801c 0x1c>;
--
2.12.2.816.g2cccc81164
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: renesas: update PFC node name to pin-controller
2017-04-26 10:05 [PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: renesas: update PFC node name to pin-controller Simon Horman
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2017-04-26 10:05 ` [PATCH 9/9] ARM: dts: sh73a0: " Simon Horman
@ 2017-04-26 11:20 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2017-04-28 5:10 ` Simon Horman
2017-05-03 8:11 ` Simon Horman
10 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2017-04-26 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi Simon,
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Simon Horman
<horms+renesas@verge.net.au> wrote:
> The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
> node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
> unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
> generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
>
> My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
> logs, and sysfs entries change from XXX.pfc and pfc at XXX to
> XXX.pin-controller and pin-controller at XXX.
>
> Boot tested on:
> r8a73a4/ape6evm
> r8a7740/armadillo800evb
> r8a7778/bockw
> r8a7790/lager
> r8a7791/koelsch
> r8a7791/porter
> r8a7793/gose
> sh73a9/kzm9g
>
> Not tested on (due to lack of hw access):
> evm2/kzm9d
> r8a7789/marzen
>
> Simon Horman (9):
For the whole series:
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread* [PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: renesas: update PFC node name to pin-controller
2017-04-26 11:20 ` [PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: renesas: " Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2017-04-28 5:10 ` Simon Horman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2017-04-28 5:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 01:20:52PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Simon Horman
> <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> wrote:
> > The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
> > node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
> > unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
> > generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
> >
> > My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
> > logs, and sysfs entries change from XXX.pfc and pfc at XXX to
> > XXX.pin-controller and pin-controller at XXX.
> >
> > Boot tested on:
> > r8a73a4/ape6evm
> > r8a7740/armadillo800evb
> > r8a7778/bockw
> > r8a7790/lager
> > r8a7791/koelsch
> > r8a7791/porter
> > r8a7793/gose
> > sh73a9/kzm9g
> >
> > Not tested on (due to lack of hw access):
> > evm2/kzm9d
> > r8a7789/marzen
> >
> > Simon Horman (9):
>
> For the whole series:
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Thanks, I have queued these up.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: renesas: update PFC node name to pin-controller
2017-04-26 10:05 [PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: renesas: update PFC node name to pin-controller Simon Horman
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2017-04-26 11:20 ` [PATCH 0/9] ARM: dts: renesas: " Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2017-05-03 8:11 ` Simon Horman
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2017-05-03 8:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:05:29PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
>
> The device trees for Renesas SoCs use either pfc or pin-controller as the
> node name for the PFC device. This patch is intended to take a step towards
> unifying the node name used as pin-controller which appears to be the more
> generic of the two and thus more in keeping with the DT specs.
>
> My analysis is that this is a user-visible change to the extent that kernel
> logs, and sysfs entries change from XXX.pfc and pfc at XXX to
> XXX.pin-controller and pin-controller at XXX.
>
> Boot tested on:
> r8a73a4/ape6evm
> r8a7740/armadillo800evb
> r8a7778/bockw
> r8a7790/lager
> r8a7791/koelsch
> r8a7791/porter
> r8a7793/gose
> sh73a9/kzm9g
>
> Not tested on (due to lack of hw access):
> evm2/kzm9d
> r8a7789/marzen
I have now tested this on r8a7789/marzen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread