From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: geert@linux-m68k.org (Geert Uytterhoeven) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 13:37:33 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 00/35] treewide trivial patches converting pr_warning to pr_warn In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Rafael, On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 8:11 AM, Joe Perches wrote: >> There are ~4300 uses of pr_warn and ~250 uses of the older >> pr_warning in the kernel source tree. >> >> Make the use of pr_warn consistent across all kernel files. >> >> This excludes all files in tools/ as there is a separate >> define pr_warning for that directory tree and pr_warn is >> not used in tools/. >> >> Done with 'sed s/\bpr_warning\b/pr_warn/' and some emacsing. > > Sorry about asking if that has been asked already. > > Wouldn't it be slightly less intrusive to simply redefined > pr_warning() as a synonym for pr_warn()? That's already the case. This series cleans up the cruft, so we can catch all users with "git grep -w pr_warn". Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds