From: geert@linux-m68k.org (Geert Uytterhoeven)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH/RFC] soc: bcm2835: Make !RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE dummies return failure
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 15:29:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWua5swcrNsvB5pbiMpuSyHSSoQhYSaqeq0ctP2csPtTA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2047337098.98106.1523186884813@email.1und1.de>
Hi Stefan,
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 1:28 PM, Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com> wrote:
>> Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> hat am 8. April 2018 um 11:05 geschrieben:
>> If CONFIG_RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE=n:
>>
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c: In function ?rpi_exp_gpio_get_polarity?:
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c:71: warning: ?get.polarity? is used uninitialized in this function
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c: In function ?rpi_exp_gpio_get_direction?:
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-raspberrypi-exp.c:150: warning: ?get.direction? is used uninitialized in this function
>>
>> The dummy firmware interface functions return 0, which means success,
>> causing subsequent code to make use of the never initialized output
>> parameter.
>
> i think this is more theoritical, because we need to get rpi_firmware first and in this case it's NULL.
Sure, I just want to get rid of the ugly warnings when compile-testing.
Most dummy functions for other subsystems return error codes.
>> Fix this by making the dummy functions return an error code (-ENOSYS)
>> instead.
>
> Anyway i'm okay with the change.
OK, thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-09 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-08 9:05 [PATCH/RFC] soc: bcm2835: Make !RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE dummies return failure Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-04-08 11:28 ` Stefan Wahren
2018-04-09 13:26 ` Phil Elwell
2018-04-09 13:29 ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2018-04-09 19:39 ` Eric Anholt
2018-04-13 22:11 ` Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMuHMdWua5swcrNsvB5pbiMpuSyHSSoQhYSaqeq0ctP2csPtTA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).