From: geert@linux-m68k.org (Geert Uytterhoeven)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC/RFT 2/6] clk: qcom: Add runtime support to handle clocks using PM clocks
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 15:08:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXXkgTDjdYanQNUJFXqUXLtGrLCOugs94MaCvg9O7wbXA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFoja9OZf+X2eaBGwTXoqFHchOz9vopLYF+wiguHXwznzw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Ulf,
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> Geert, thanks, I was wondering how you handle the !CONFIG_PM case for
>>> rmobile. I mean who turns the clocks on for the devices when you build
>>> with CONFIG_PM disabled?
>>
>> We still use pm_clk_add_notifier() in drivers/sh/pm_runtime.c if
>> CONFIG_PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS_OF=n. Hence the second instance of
>> pm_clk_notify() will enable the clocks at driver binding time.
>> Hardware power domains are assumed enabled by reset state/the boot
>> loader.
>
> Yes, it a bit tricky - but I guess that's the current only viable
> solution if we have when using the pm_clk API.
>
>> Given the amount of PM infrastructure involved when hardware power and
>> clock domains are involved, I think at one point we'll have to start restricting
>> our builds to CONFIG_PM=y.
>
> I don't think that would solve the problem, since you may still have
> cross SoC drivers which may be used without CONFIG_PM.
That's not as much of a problem as it sounds:
- If the driver cares (needs to know) about the clock, it should already
manage it itself.
- If it doesn't care about the clock, it just needs Runtime PM support.
That will do the right thing on platforms with (needs PM=y) and without
(doesn't care about PM=x) clock domains.
So the bigger "problem" is making sure all drivers have at least minimal
Runtime PM support, else they can't be reused as-is on systems with PM
domains.
> So all SoC that uses a driver which expects clocks to be managed using
> PM clocks from a PM domain, will need the above "trick". Right?
One remaining issue with pm_clk_add_notifier() is that it applies to all
platform devices in the system, not just the on-SoC devices. Hence it may
inadvertently manage clocks for off-SoC devices it's not supposed to touch.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert at linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-29 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-23 8:45 [RFC/RFT 0/6] qcom: Add runtime PM support Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-23 8:45 ` [RFC/RFT 1/6] PM / clock_ops: Make pm_clk_notify() do nothing in case DT passes power-domains Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-23 8:45 ` [RFC/RFT 2/6] clk: qcom: Add runtime support to handle clocks using PM clocks Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-24 10:03 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-24 10:58 ` Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-26 8:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-27 20:02 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-28 2:52 ` Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-28 7:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-29 9:49 ` Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-29 11:30 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-29 12:31 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-29 13:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2015-04-30 6:21 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-30 9:02 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-27 7:08 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-23 8:45 ` [RFC/RFT 3/6] serial: msm: convert driver to use runtime PM apis Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-29 0:16 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-04-29 3:15 ` Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-23 8:45 ` [RFC/RFT 4/6] mmc: sdhci-msm: " Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-23 13:21 ` Ulf Hansson
2015-04-23 13:42 ` Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-23 21:15 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-24 0:45 ` Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-23 13:43 ` Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-23 8:45 ` [RFC/RFT 5/6] i2c: qup: Get rid of clock handling as its done using runtime callbacks Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-23 21:16 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-24 2:32 ` Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-25 7:01 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-04-27 2:36 ` Rajendra Nayak
2015-04-23 8:45 ` [RFC/RFT 6/6] spi: " Rajendra Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMuHMdXXkgTDjdYanQNUJFXqUXLtGrLCOugs94MaCvg9O7wbXA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).