From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: haojian.zhuang@gmail.com (Haojian Zhuang) Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 13:24:57 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: pinctrl-single: enhance to configure multiple pins of different modules In-Reply-To: <1369145282-14419-3-git-send-email-prakash.pm@ti.com> References: <1369145282-14419-1-git-send-email-prakash.pm@ti.com> <1369145282-14419-3-git-send-email-prakash.pm@ti.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Manjunathappa, Prakash wrote: > Add support to configure multiple pins in each register, existing > implementation added by [1] does not support full fledge multiple pin > configuration in single register, reports a pin clash when different > modules configure different bits of same register. The issue reported > and discussed here > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg235213.html > > With pinctrl-single,bits-per-mux property specified, use function-mask > property to find out number pins to configure. Allocate and register > pin control functions based sub mask. > > Tested on da850/omap-l138 EVM. > does not support variable submask for pins. > does not support pinconf. > > [1] "pinctrl: pinctrl-single: Add pinctrl-single,bits type of mux" > (9e605cb68a21d5704839a192a46ebcf387773704), > > Signed-off-by: Manjunathappa, Prakash > Reported-by: Lad, Prabhakar > Tested-by: Lad, Prabhakar Excuse me for response late. Acked-by: Haojian Zhuang