From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: haojian.zhuang@gmail.com (Haojian Zhuang) Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:28:04 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v6 01/11] irqchip: move mmp irq driver In-Reply-To: References: <1374833133-21119-1-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> <1374833133-21119-2-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang@gmail.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:27 AM, Daniel Drake wrote: > Hi Haojian, > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Daniel Drake wrote: >> This patch series affects 3 different subsystems: irqchip, >> clocksource, clk. It's not clear from your submission who you are >> expecting to review/merge this. Unless there is some prior agreement, >> maybe it would be easier and clearer to divide this up by subsystem. >> There doesn't seem to be any overlap/dependencies between the 3 parts. > > I haven't heard back from you on these patches. Is there anything I > can do to help? > > I know these patches are blocking the 5-or-so patches I am trying to > submit for OLPC XO support. Only one of those patches is perhaps > calling for discussion (how to put the clocks in DT) and it is a bit > frustrating that after two months we have still not progressed. > > To start with, maybe I could resend patches 1 to 5 in this series to > the irqchip maintainers, with the review comments incorporated, adding > the following 2 patches on at the > end?http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-June/176643.html > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-June/176643.html > > Or any other suggestions for how I can help things move along? > > Thanks > Daniel I'll update the clock patches in this series. Since I was very busy, I didn't have time to handle it. I'll submit them again in this week. IRQ & clocksource patches will go through ARM SoC. clock patches will go through clock tree. The clocksource patches are depended on clock patches. Regards Haojian